On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 08:31:45PM +1100, raf wrote:
> raf wrote:
>
> > Andrew W. Nosenko wrote:
> >
> > > Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> > > : I may stick with GnuPG as is. However that
> > > : raises my original question. gpg.rc uses gpg_2comp (I may have the name
> > >
raf wrote:
> Andrew W. Nosenko wrote:
>
> > Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> > : I may stick with GnuPG as is. However that
> > : raises my original question. gpg.rc uses gpg_2comp (I may have the name
> >^
> > gpg.rc don't use gpg_2comp starting at
Andrew W. Nosenko wrote:
> Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> : I may stick with GnuPG as is. However that
> : raises my original question. gpg.rc uses gpg_2comp (I may have the name
>^
> gpg.rc don't use gpg_2comp starting at 2000-03-03. All commands
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 11:08:14AM +0300, Andrew W. Nosenko wrote:
> Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> : I may stick with GnuPG as is. However that
> : raises my original question. gpg.rc uses gpg_2comp (I may have the name
>^
> gpg.rc don't use gpg_2co
Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
: I may stick with GnuPG as is. However that
: raises my original question. gpg.rc uses gpg_2comp (I may have the name
^
gpg.rc don't use gpg_2comp starting at 2000-03-03. All commands what use
gpg_2comp is commented out
On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 04:21:19PM +0200, Peter J . Holzer wrote:
> On 2000-10-20 17:02:57 +0930, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> > I recently decided to try GnuPG after using only pgp2 off and on for
> > some years. It was only after I downloaded it and played with it for a
> > while, that I realised
On 2000-10-20 17:02:57 +0930, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> I recently decided to try GnuPG after using only pgp2 off and on for
> some years. It was only after I downloaded it and played with it for a
> while, that I realised that version 1.0.3 was very recent. I had got in
> right at the beginning
Dan Boger writes:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 05:02:57PM +0930, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> > I recently decided to try GnuPG after using only pgp2 off and on for
> > some years. It was only after I downloaded it and played with it for a
> > while, that I realised that version 1.0.3 was very recent.
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 05:02:57PM +0930, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> I recently decided to try GnuPG after using only pgp2 off and on for
> some years. It was only after I downloaded it and played with it for a
> while, that I realised that version 1.0.3 was very recent. I had got in
> right at th
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 05:02:57PM +0930, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> I recently decided to try GnuPG after using only pgp2 off and on for
> some years. It was only after I downloaded it and played with it for a
> while, that I realised that version 1.0.3 was very recent. I had got in
> right at th
Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> I recently decided to try GnuPG after using only pgp2 off and on for
> some years. It was only after I downloaded it and played with it for a
> while, that I realised that version 1.0.3 was very recent. I had got in
> right at the beginning of a new version. This new ve
I recently decided to try GnuPG after using only pgp2 off and on for
some years. It was only after I downloaded it and played with it for a
while, that I realised that version 1.0.3 was very recent. I had got in
right at the beginning of a new version. This new version incorporates
RSA which I und
12 matches
Mail list logo
