Re: Group replying: set To: instead of Cc:

2014-10-18 Thread Elias Diem
On 2014-10-13, Derek Martin wrote: - edit_headers This is what I do now to solve my problem. -- Greetings Elias

Re: Group replying: set To: instead of Cc:

2014-10-16 Thread Elias Diem
Hi Chris On 2014-10-16, Chris Bannister wrote: Oooops, sorry, I meant shift-l, i.e: L Ok ;-) No it doesn't. See my previous post. -- Greetings Elias

Re: Group replying: set To: instead of Cc:

2014-10-15 Thread Chris Bannister
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 06:01:24PM +0200, Elias Diem wrote: Hi Chris On 2014-10-14, Chris Bannister wrote: try CTRL-L Does it do what you want? Hmmm. From the manual, CTRL-L is used to refresh the screen. What do I miss here? Oooops, sorry, I meant shift-l, i.e: L -- If you're

Re: Group replying: set To: instead of Cc:

2014-10-14 Thread Elias Diem
Hi there On 2014-10-13, Derek Martin wrote: I think your question is a little vague to get good answers snip/ Yes, this is it. So let me precise it. I don't talk about mailing lists but messages that come from one person to many. Suppose I've got the following simplified header where 'ME'

Re: Group replying: set To: instead of Cc:

2014-10-14 Thread Elias Diem
Hi Chris On 2014-10-14, Chris Bannister wrote: try CTRL-L Does it do what you want? Hmmm. From the manual, CTRL-L is used to refresh the screen. What do I miss here? -- Greetings Elias

Re: Group replying: set To: instead of Cc:

2014-10-14 Thread Derek Martin
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 05:59:13PM +0200, Elias Diem wrote: So let me precise it. I don't talk about mailing lists but messages that come from one person to many. [...] Now I'd like to reply to A and B and I want those addresses to be both in the To: field. The new header would look

Re: Group replying: set To: instead of Cc:

2014-10-14 Thread Elias Diem
Hi Derek On 2014-10-14, Derek Martin wrote: That said, I believe the intended behavior is to put only the To addresses in the To: field, and everything else in the Cc: field. The difference between To: and Cc: is basically that if the author puts you in the To: field, the author expects

Group replying: set To: instead of Cc:

2014-10-13 Thread Elias Diem
Hi all I often group reply to messages. I'd like to set the To: field with the reply addresses instead of the Cc: field. Is this possible? I didn't find anything on the list archive. -- Greetings Elias

Re: Group replying: set To: instead of Cc:

2014-10-13 Thread stargrave
Greetings! *** Elias Diem li...@webconect.ch [2014-10-13 21:24]: I often group reply to messages. I'd like to set the To: field with the reply addresses instead of the Cc: field. Is this possible? I didn't find anything on the list archive. I think that article is good for explaining of

Re: Group replying: set To: instead of Cc:

2014-10-13 Thread Derek Martin
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 07:20:36PM +0200, Elias Diem wrote: I often group reply to messages. I'd like to set the To: field with the reply addresses instead of the Cc: field. Is this possible? I didn't find anything on the list archive. I think your question is a little vague to get good

Re: Group replying: set To: instead of Cc:

2014-10-13 Thread Chris Bannister
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 07:20:36PM +0200, Elias Diem wrote: Hi all I often group reply to messages. I'd like to set the To: field with the reply addresses instead of the Cc: field. Is this possible? I didn't find anything on the list archive. try CTRL-L Does it do what you want? -- If