On Thu, Aug 24, 2000 at 20:17:59 +0100, Bruno Postle wrote:
I guess the problem is probably that when you attach an image in mutt it
uses 'Content-Disposition: attachment' in the mime headers whereas
netscape (for example) uses 'Content-Disposition: inline'.
You can decide yourself if any
Can you put images into the body of an email with mutt. If so how do you do
so.
Thanks for your time,
Clark
Clark Elliott Flowers
Tech. Intranet Administrator/D.B.A.
7277World Communication Drive Omaha NE, 68122
+1 402 963 5885
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Clark Flowers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thu, 24 Aug 2000:
Can you put images into the body of an email with mutt. If so how do you do
so.
You can add image files as attachements, if that's what you mean.
In the compose menu, press "a" to attach a file, and type in the
filename (possibly
Clark --
...and then Clark Flowers said...
% Can you put images into the body of an email with mutt. If so how do you do
% so.
Although you would probably be heavily berated for doing so on this list,
you could probably manage it by creating an HTML page containing your
mail text and your
At 12:40 -0400 24 Aug 2000, David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Although you would probably be heavily berated for doing so on this list,
you could probably manage it by creating an HTML page containing your
mail text and your image and then attaching both of those to your email.
But you won't
it's called ASCII ART. If you want to really do this, I seriously
suggest installing Windows and Outlook. Then removing yourself from the
mutt list.
:)
On Thu, Aug 24, 2000 at 10:14:06AM -0500, Clark Flowers muttered:
| Can you put images into the body of an email with mutt. If so how do you
On Thu 24-Aug-2000 at 12:40:59PM -0400, David T-G wrote:
mutt creates, by default, ordinary text messages, though they can be
enhanced by changing character sets, so the only image you could truly
put into a standard message would be a good old-fashioned ASCII
drawing.
I guess the problem
