Louis LeBlanc [mutt-users] <30/07/01 00:53 -0400>:
> Yes, I am using L (l is actually limit-messages or something), and I
> do have all the list addresses in my lists line. Unfortunately, I
> would still like mail sent to just one to be flagged as list mail as
As you are using 1.3.19 mutt, plea
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 09:45:55AM -0400, Jim Toth ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
said:
[snip]
> * ^From.*mutt-users
> {
> :0 fw
> |formail -i Mail-Followup-To:
>
> :0:
> mutt-users
> }
>
> Tested:
[...]
I should mention here, I suppose, that the procmail fragment itself
was not tested, but rather
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 12:53:28AM -0400, Louis LeBlanc
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> Yes, I am using L (l is actually limit-messages or something), and I
> do have all the list addresses in my lists line. Unfortunately, I
> would still like mail sent to just one to be flagged as list mail as
> wel
Yes, I am using L (l is actually limit-messages or something), and I
do have all the list addresses in my lists line. Unfortunately, I
would still like mail sent to just one to be flagged as list mail as
well without trying to reply to them all when someone else makes the
mistake. At the very le
Hey all. Seeing some unpleasant behavior lately.
When replying to list mail, mutt seems to be catching ALL addresses it
can find to CC or reply to. How can I unset the CC and make sure that
the list is the ONLY one being sent to? I've seen a couple warnings
about sending to more than one list a
