Re: OT: procmail recipe for two actions for a message?

2001-12-10 Thread David Champion
On 2001.12.09, in [EMAIL PROTECTED], Matej Cepl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: However, emails in this list have mungled Reply-To: directing to the list. Could it be possible to ask procmail (or how to ask procmail) that before moving the message to the listy folder, it would run a

OT: procmail recipe for two actions for a message?

2001-12-09 Thread Matej Cepl
Hi, sorry for OT question, but I think, for anybody really familiar with procmail it will be only mild distraction. I have this very simple recipe in my .procmailrc: :0: * ^TOcstex listy However, emails in this list have mungled Reply-To: directing to the list. Could it

Re: OT: procmail recipe for two actions for a message?

2001-12-09 Thread Nicolas Rachinsky
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 02:56:05PM -0500, Matej Cepl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, sorry for OT question, but I think, for anybody really familiar with procmail it will be only mild distraction. I have this very simple recipe in my .procmailrc: :0: * ^TOcstex listy

Re: OT: procmail recipe for two actions for a message?

2001-12-09 Thread Curt W. Zirzow
* Matej Cepl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, sorry for OT question, but I think, for anybody really familiar with procmail it will be only mild distraction. I have this very simple recipe in my .procmailrc: :0: * ^TOcstex listy However, emails in this list have

Re: OT: procmail recipe for two actions for a message?

2001-12-09 Thread Bruno Postle
On Sun 09-Dec-2001 at 02:56:05PM -0500, Matej Cepl wrote: However, emails in this list have mungled Reply-To: directing to the list. Could it be possible to ask procmail (or how to ask procmail) that before moving the message to the listy folder, it would run a message through grep -v

Re: OT: procmail recipe for two actions for a message?

2001-12-09 Thread Johan Andersson
On Sun, 09 Dec 2001, Nicolas Rachinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I haven't done this before and didn't test it, but something like :0 hf: * ^TOcstex | grep -v '^Reply-To:' should do what you want. Look in man procmailrc for filter. You need of course a second recipe to deliver the mail. I

Re: OT: procmail recipe for two actions for a message?

2001-12-09 Thread Johan Andersson
Ok. Just after I sent that mail I somehow got the feeling I had made a fool out of myself. And yes, I re-read the procmailrc man page and found out what the 'h' flag is for. Well, that's me, always trying to be smart. At least this time I learned something :) -- Johan Andersson [EMAIL

Re: OT: procmail recipe for two actions for a message?

2001-12-09 Thread Nicolas Rachinsky
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 12:22:00AM +0100, Benjamin Michotte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hello, On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 02:56:05PM, Matej Cepl wrote: Hi, I benefit of this off-topic to ask a little question too. Actually, I have this :0: * ^(To|Cc).*linux@lists\.linuxbe\.org linux

Re: OT: procmail recipe for two actions for a message?

2001-12-09 Thread Baurjan Ismagulov
Hello, On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 12:22:00AM +0100, Benjamin Michotte wrote: Is it possible to set something like :0: * ^(To|Cc).*linux@lists\.linuxbe\.org * ^(To|Cc).*linux@lists\.unixtech\.be linux Seems that this will match only messages sent to both lists, which is probably not what you

Re: OT: procmail recipe for two actions for a message?

2001-12-09 Thread Matej Cepl
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 09:40:04PM +0100, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: I haven't done this before and didn't test it, but something like :0 hf: * ^TOcstex | grep -v '^Reply-To:' should do what you want. Look in man procmailrc for filter. You need of course a second recipe to deliver the mail.

Re: OT: procmail recipe for two actions for a message?

2001-12-09 Thread Benjamin Michotte
hello, On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 02:56:05PM, Matej Cepl wrote: Hi, I benefit of this off-topic to ask a little question too. Actually, I have this :0: * ^(To|Cc).*linux@lists\.linuxbe\.org linux :0: * ^(To|Cc).*linux@lists\.unixtech\.be linux Is it possible to set something like :0: *