of the operative part.
msg22732/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
the pgp_outlook_compat patch (something like that anyway) that
you can pick up at http://mutt.justpickone.org
Yes, but as has been pointed out a number of times, the patch
does not cause the MIME type to be set to text/plain. It remains
application/pgp. The only way to sign and have the content type
set
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 02:47:50PM -0800, Jonathan Irving wrote:
Yes, but as has been pointed out a number of times, the patch
does not cause the MIME type to be set to text/plain.
This is just wrong. Setting the mime type to text/plain instead of
application/pgp is the very purpose
/plain instead of
application/pgp is the very purpose of the ``PGP Outlook compatibility
patch'' (which I call ``PGP compatibility patch'').
What has confused a few people is the fact that the patch is effective
only if both pgp_outlook_compat and pgp_create_traditional are set.
You're right. My
= have_any_sigs || (clearsign (s-flags M_VERIFY));
if(!clearsign || s-flags M_VERIFY)
{
msg22742/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 10-01-02 at 08:11
* Cristian said
This is just wrong. Setting the mime type to text/plain instead of
application/pgp is the very purpose of the ``PGP Outlook compatibility
patch'' (which I call ``PGP compatibility patch'').
What has
Tel:+45 3325 0688
Fax:+45 3325 0677
Web:www.explodingnet.com
msg22579/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
anyway (my mom, for example), attachments like AT029102.TXT
are confusing. If it was called SIGNATURE.TXT or something, she might
more easily understand it and ignore it.
Et cetera.
--
rjbs
msg22581/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
than wondering what odd thing I've sent them.
--
Nick Wilson
Tel:+45 3325 0688
Fax:+45 3325 0677
Web:www.explodingnet.com
msg22582/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi all
When I pick up mails using Outlook I get 2 attachments. One containing
my email message and the other the pgp signiture.
I was told that the pgp-outlook patch would correct this but I'm not
having any luck.
What I'm looking for is someone that has maybe applied this patch to
give me
Thus spake Nick Wilson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
When I pick up mails using Outlook I get 2 attachments. One containing
my email message and the other the pgp signiture.
I was told that the pgp-outlook patch would correct this but I'm not
having any luck.
What I'm looking for is someone
Nick --
...and then Nick Wilson said...
%
% Hi all
% When I pick up mails using Outlook I get 2 attachments. One containing
% my email message and the other the pgp signiture.
Right.
%
% I was told that the pgp-outlook patch would correct this but I'm not
% having any luck.
You have
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020108 18:18]:
Nick --
...and then Nick Wilson said...
%
% Hi all
% When I pick up mails using Outlook I get 2 attachments. One containing
% my email message and the other the pgp signiture.
Right.
%
% I was told that the pgp-outlook patch would
).
--
Justin R. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
View my website at http://codesorcery.net
Please encrypt email using key 0xC9C40C31
msg22620/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hey Nick
Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [08 Jan 2002 18:34 +0100]:
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020108 18:18]:
Nick --
...and then Nick Wilson said...
%
% Hi all
% When I pick up mails using Outlook I get 2 attachments. One containing
% my email message and the other the pgp
Jonathan Irving wrote:
It's still an application/pgp message.
i've proposed to the dev list that this be changed before the next full
release. it seems silly to cling to a standard that was withdrawn, and
that no other MUAs take advantage of / can read.
since pgp/mime is the 'standard
Nick --
...and then Nick Wilson said...
%
% * David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020108 18:18]:
%
% ...and then Nick Wilson said...
% %
% % I was told that the pgp-outlook patch would correct this but I'm not
% % having any luck.
%
% You have to both set $pgp_create_traditional (which
At this point I have to agree with this sentiment. After six years, we are
really no furthur to the point of OpenPGP/MIME acceptance. I've personally
taken to just using a macro in VIM to invoke gpg messages because I have
to deal with a large number of Outlook users. I endorse changing
Will, et al --
...and then Will Yardley said...
%
% Jonathan Irving wrote:
%
% It's still an application/pgp message.
%
% i've proposed to the dev list that this be changed before the next full
% release. it seems silly to cling to a standard that was withdrawn, and
% that no other MUAs
most of us (ie computer geeks / mutt users)
might not like windoze, the fact of the matter is that we have to
communicate with people who do on a daily basis.
I'll argue that most of the PGP crowd isn't interested in making it easy
for anyone to use PGP/gnupg. I'm making miniscule progress
on those two switches?
Mucho grassy arse
--
Nick Wilson
Tel:+45 3325 0688
Fax:+45 3325 0677
Web:www.explodingnet.com
msg22632/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Wilson
Tel:+45 3325 0688
Fax:+45 3325 0677
Web:www.explodingnet.com
msg22633/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Thus spake Michael Elkins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I endorse changing pgp_create_traditional such that for text/plain
messages it doesn't alter the content-type.
So you're saying to make the Outlook patch standard? I wasn't aware
that application/pgp-whatever was withdrawn. If that's the case
.nr.tag_prefix_cond (dtg)
Feature patch: patch-1.3.23.ats.mark_old-1.3.23+cvs-1.diff (dtg)
Feature patch: patch-1.3.25i.devl.narrow_tree.1 (dtg)
Feature patch: patch-1.3.25.dw.pgp-hook (dtg)
msg22636/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
This would not affect the PGP/MIME support at all. It will continue to
function as it always has. I just don't think there is any value in
continuing to label application/pgp messages: you should either use PGP/MIME
or just clearsign the message without changing the content-type.
me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
% I'm workin' on it :-) You could also grab the -05 tar file from the
% clean directory and un-tar and then configure and make, but you'd get
% all of the rest of my patches, too ;-)
Well, unless you're going to tell me this message is badly
Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [08 Jan 2002 21:35 +0100]:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[body of message here]
[sig here]
It's supposed to just be signed. Is there a need for that top bit?
The digital signature is, I believe, a SHA1 hash of the message
content
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The digital signature is, I believe, a SHA1 hash of the message
content, encrypted using your private key. The hash is a
checksum; the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
is important to recompute the checksum for verification.
That's my
Michael, et al --
...and then Michael Elkins said...
%
% This would not affect the PGP/MIME support at all. It will continue to
Oh, no; of course not.
% function as it always has. I just don't think there is any value in
% continuing to label application/pgp messages: you should either use
I asked this in another message, but it looks like it got lost... can
someone please confirm or deny that they see this behaviour as well under
1.3.25?
1. use the new check-traditional-pgp command from the index on a message
that has an old-style pgp signature
2. note that the 's' flag
Jeremy --
...and then Jeremy Blosser said...
%
% I asked this in another message, but it looks like it got lost... can
% someone please confirm or deny that they see this behaviour as well under
% 1.3.25?
I'm running 1.3.25, so ...
%
% 1. use the new check-traditional-pgp command from
* Justin R. Miller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Jan 08. 2002 12:05]:
[ snipped query about pgp_outlook_compat ]
On a somewhat related note, for anyone who didn't know, Debian for a few
versions now has supported this patch already in the sid package.
When I was using 1.3.24 in woody it supported
Someone found a bug with my patch (http://www.woolridge.org/mutt/) which
caused silent failure when attempting to send an encrypted message to a
recipient without a matching pgp-hook. The obvious symptom is that the
send-message command ('y' by default) in the compose menu would appear
]
http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
msg22441/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Dale, et al --
...and then Dale Woolridge said...
%
% David noted that my recent pgp-hook extension patch conflicts with
Hey, I'm famous! *grin*
% Bardur Arantsson's pgp-hook-extension patch. Borrowing Bardur's
% idea and following David's suggestion, I have implemented the same
% idea
. The implementation is altogether different too.
--
-Dale
msg22408/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Ah, you mistake signature and encryption! :)
A signature is just that -- it's a cryptographic message that proves that you
'signed' (and, presumably) sent a message. If I send you a message that I've
signed with gpg, you can be sure that I wrote it. (Or at least that I approved
it.)
* Justin R. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020105 09:31]:
Thus spake Nick Wilson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I've been seeing 'pgp signitures' and suchlike since joining this
group and I'm a bit baffled.
Why the need to encrypt harmless text?
It looks interesting and I wondered if you might
Morten
--
Morten Liebach [EMAIL PROTECTED] webthingy at http://kallisti.dk/
PGP-Key-ID: 0xD796A4EB on keyserver.net or at http://kallisti.dk/ml.asc
from time to time.
Have a nice day
Morten
--
Morten Liebach [EMAIL PROTECTED] webthingy at http://kallisti.dk/
PGP-Key-ID: 0xD796A4EB on keyserver.net or at http://kallisti.dk/ml.asc
Thanks Morten. I'm on the Man page as I write!
I got confused as the key
]
View my website at http://codesorcery.net
Please encrypt email using key 0xC9C40C31
msg22322/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Thus spake Nick Wilson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
2. When I run mutt after inseting your pgp directives in .muttrc i get
a 'pgp_good_sign unknown variable' message. What's going on there?
This is only available in the 1.3.x branch of mutt. You should
definitely try it (the latest is 1.3.25
.
Cheers
--
Nick Wilson
Tel:+45 3325 0688
Fax:+45 3325 0677
Web:www.explodingnet.com
msg22325/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wednesday I sent out a note about a patch I had developed for mutt which
allows for circumventing the pgp-hook confirm prompt as well as automatically
selecting keys (when only one matching key is available). I have made a update
to the patch, correcting a possible error in scanning trust
Hi folks
I've been seeing 'pgp signitures' and suchlike since joining this group
and I'm a bit baffled.
Why the need to encrypt harmless text?
It looks interesting and I wondered if you might share some opinions and
pointers with me?
Cheers
--
Nick Wilson
Tel:+45 3325 0688
Fax
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 10:54:46PM +0100, Nick Wilson wrote:
Hi folks
I've been seeing 'pgp signitures' and suchlike since joining this group
and I'm a bit baffled.
Why the need to encrypt harmless text?
It looks interesting and I wondered if you might share some opinions and
pointers
Thus spake Nick Wilson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I've been seeing 'pgp signitures' and suchlike since joining this
group and I'm a bit baffled.
Why the need to encrypt harmless text?
It looks interesting and I wondered if you might share some opinions
and pointers with me?
I wrote a guide
David noted that my recent pgp-hook extension patch conflicts with
Bardur Arantsson's pgp-hook-extension patch. Borrowing Bardur's
idea and following David's suggestion, I have implemented the same
idea following the existing hook model more closely. You can find
the new patch at http
Attached is a patch which introduces two new variables, pgp_autoselectkey and
pgp_confirmhook, with defaults of 0/no and 1/yes respectively. The motivation
here is that when I use pgp-hook I really don't want to be asked if that's the
key I intended to use. Arguably, the confirmation is useful
On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 07:08:57PM -0500, Ian P. Thomas wrote:
Here is the error message that appears after I try and sign my
mail with my gpg key:
Can't open PGP subprocess!: No such file or directory (errno = 2)
I figured that it couldn't find the ~/.gnupg directory
I've had a good look in the archives, but I've been unable to find the
URL for the outlookpatch, does anyone know where to find it?
--
Benjamin Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
msg22069/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 09:53:15AM +, Benjamin Smith wrote:
On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 07:08:57PM -0500, Ian P. Thomas wrote:
Here is the error message that appears after I try and sign my
mail with my gpg key:
Can't open PGP subprocess!: No such file or directory (errno = 2
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gpg.rc.gz
Description: application/gunzip
msg22075/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
to them. -- fortune cookie
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
msg22078/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
but is difficult ;p)
[clip]
---end quoted text---
happy new year to all,
binny
--
question = ( to ) ? be : ! be;
-- Wm. Shakespeare
°v° Benjamin Michotte[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_o_ web : http://www.baby-linux.net
msg22023/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, 31 Dec 2001, Benjamin Michotte wrote:
just to say that I finally win :)
I convert 3 friends to use mutt and they're really happy now ;)
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 10:18:50PM, Benjamin Michotte wrote:
Is it possible to ask mutt sending signed messages in line or must I
force my
, and there are probably others. Many people have tried
to get some basic, groundbreaking mutt documentation together to show
new users the basics of whipping up an SMTP server, choosing an editor,
using gpg or PGP, and so on. The biggest problem is that we experienced
drivers have forgotten what it's
Just picking a random point here...
On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 05:04:22AM -0500 I heard the voice of
Philip Mak, and lo! it spake thus:
I think that mutt is a good e-mail client, but the default configuration
is sub-optimal (vim doesn't format paragraphs well by default, some of the
Well, vim
Here is the error message that appears after I try and sign my
mail with my gpg key:
Can't open PGP subprocess!: No such file or directory (errno = 2)
I figured that it couldn't find the ~/.gnupg directory, but it's
there. I have set pgp_sign_as=my key id in my muttrc
hi all,
i've generated my public and private keys with
ssh-keygen -t dsa
I tried to send a pgp signed mail, but what i get is:
gpg: no default secret key: secret key not available
gpg: signing failed: secret key not available
what must i do?
thanks
--
giorgian
Moin,
* giorgian [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-12-22 14:54]:
i've generated my public and private keys with
ssh-keygen -t dsa
I tried to send a pgp signed mail, but what i get is:
gpg: no default secret key: secret key not available
gpg: signing failed: secret key not available
what must i do?
I
Giorgian --
...and then giorgian said...
%
% hi all,
Hello!
%
% i've generated my public and private keys with
%
% ssh-keygen -t dsa
Note that those are your ssh session keys and having nothing to do with
pgp and gpg...
%
% I tried to send a pgp signed mail, but what i get is:
% gpg
key.
but when i read someone else's gpg signed email, what i read is:
gpg: Signature made Sat Dec 22 17:24:05 2001 CET using DSA key ID 7B9F4700
gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
what must i do to get people's public keys?
thaks again
--
msg21845/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP
attempt to PGP/MIME sign outgoing messages. This
[...]
you don't want to have mutt save your passphrase; doing that would
probably necessitate storing your passphrase in cleartext somewhere.
mutt will cache your passphrase for a short period of time after you've
typed it though.
if you
giorgian wrote:
1) how can i tell mutt to automatically signs all my mail, and not to
ask for my passphrase every time?
also note that signing all of your mail may result in problems for other
people - if their MUA doesn't like PGP/MIME, or 'application/pgp' type
emails (the only types
, the other way around, it might be a good idea to upload
_your_ public key to a server, too!
--
René Clerc - ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
The distance between insanity and genius is measured only by success.
-James Bond, Tomorrow Never Dies
msg21849/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP
check signature: public key not found
what must i do to get people's public keys?
You have to specify a keyserver either via gpg's --keyserver option in
in your gpg options file.
$ grep ^keyserver ~/.gnupg/options
keyserver wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net
HTH,
Michael
--
PGP-Key: http://www-stud.ims.uni
: no
Setting this variable will cause Mutt to always
attempt to PGP/MIME sign outgoing messages. This
[...]
you don't want to have mutt save your passphrase; doing that would
probably necessitate storing your passphrase in cleartext somewhere.
mutt will cache your
Moin,
* giorgian [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-12-22 17:38]:
1) how can i tell mutt to automatically signs all my mail
set pgp_autosign
and not to ask for my passphrase every time?
You shouldn't do this (and I don't know how it's done).
2) if i send a signed email to myself, mutt recognizes my public
]
View my website at http://codesorcery.net
Please encrypt email using key 0xC9C40C31
msg21853/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Thus spake Benjamin Michotte ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
when mutt send a GPG message, it use PGP/MIME as defined in RFC 2015
and/or 3156.
Yes. Mutt is in the minority for doing this, but it's now the right
way, especially for non-US character sets.
Some friends use mua as kmail which still use
: http://www.informatik.hu-berlin.de/~rosenfel/
msg21503/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
forgot to mention that. I know that I mentioned that
_someplace_ today :-)
--
Justin R. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
View my website at http://codesorcery.net
Please encrypt email using key 0xC9C40C31
msg21504/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
(look at the archives).
Ok, so, I will continue to push them to mutt ;)
well there's always a happy middle ground. 'Becky!' has an openPGP
plugin i'm told, and should work with PGP/Mime mails if this plugin is
installed. there's a link to the main site for this at:
http://www.rimarts.co.jp
Hello,
when mutt send a GPG message, it use PGP/MIME as defined in RFC 2015
and/or 3156.
Some friends use mua as kmail which still use PGP in line as described
in RFC 1991 and receive my mails signed/crypted as attachments.
Is it possible to ask mutt sending signed messages in line or must I
loki.games.civ-ctp
°v° Benjamin Michotte[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_o_ web : http://www.baby-linux.net
msg21566/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Guide to Unix
msg21312/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Michael --
...and then Michael P. Soulier said...
%
% Hey people.
Hi!
%
% When I send a digitally signed email to some users using M$ Lookout!, they are
% immediately prompted for an encryption scheme and they cannot even open my
So this isn't the classic case of PGP/MIME problems
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 10:50:57AM -0500, Michael P. Soulier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey people.
When I send a digitally signed email to some users using M$ Lookout!, they are
immediately prompted for an encryption scheme and they cannot even open my
email until they set one up. Perhaps
Hello Mutt-Users
First of all: I love mutt. It really rocks.
Ok. Lets get down to business. I tried to create a small script which
automatically verifies pgp-signed mails from mutt. I have a
mailinglist-archive for all of the mailinglists I get. But I want to
verify the signatures when
On Sat, 24 Nov 2001, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
is there any way to check normal pgp-signatures on demand like with
Theres esc P note the capitol P, that should verify cleartext sigs.
--
Don't tell me I'm burning the candle at both ends -- tell me where to
get more wax!!
-
David Clarke [EMAIL
i created my 2 keys and exported them like it is described here:
http://www.freeos.com/articles/2927/
but when i want to sign and/or encrypt mail, mutt says that i need a
UserID:
I enter the id and press ctrl+g (otherwise this line does not exit!)
then mutt is searching for a user id in an
Luca --
...and then Luca said...
% Hi guys,
Hi!
% can you tell me how can i show the pgp signature on the pager
% like a text plain message ?
I've waited for someone else to reply since I just didn't understand what
you asked, but I haven't seen anything else go by. When I read a signed
priority list, so please don't hold your
breath, but I'll give a note, when I'm done. ;-)
Cheers,
Viktor
--
Viktor Rosenfeld
WWW: http://www.informatik.hu-berlin.de/~rosenfel/
msg20364/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
associated with send-message. And appart from breaking MIME (which
isn't a problem with Outlook in the first place), it works quite well.
Okay, this was verbose. :)
Cheers,
Viktor
--
Viktor Rosenfeld
WWW: http://www.informatik.hu-berlin.de/~rosenfel/
PGP signature
on pgp_create_traditional,
which only works for us-ascii mail as stated in the manual. So for us
non-us users, we have to rely on macros do pgp-sign mail to Outlook
users.
Here's what I do:
# This will select the correct behavior for all
# non-Outlook-users
send-hook . set
to rely on macros do pgp-sign mail to Outlook
% users.
Hey, that's a good point that brings up another: can you sign multipart
mail this way? If I want to forward something to a LookOut! user and
either sign or encrypt it, p_o_c and p_c_t fall back to MIME format, and
yet I know that multipart has
Dear all,
in muttrc, I easily can set a sendhook such that every email gets
signed by PGP. But this always sets the MIME type accordingly.
Is it possible to have a sendhook defintion that allows the
PGP sign mail without MIME
as I can specify it manually with ctrl-P in the send menu
Hi,
* Lukas Ruf [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-11-09 13:23]:
in muttrc, I easily can set a sendhook such that every email gets
signed by PGP. But this always sets the MIME type accordingly.
- - -
6.3.101. pgp_autosign
Type: boolean
Default: no
Setting this variable will cause Mutt to always
Hi guys,
can you tell me how can i show the pgp signature on the pager
like a text plain message ?
thanks for your attention,
Luca
Suresh, et al -
...and then Suresh Ramasubramanian said...
% Thorsten Haude mutt [09/11/01 14:49 +0100]:
% * Lukas Ruf [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-11-09 13:23]:
% in muttrc, I easily can set a sendhook such that every email gets
% signed by PGP. But this always sets the MIME type accordingly
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thorsten Haude mutt [09/11/01 14:49 +0100]:
* Lukas Ruf [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-11-09 13:23]:
in muttrc, I easily can set a sendhook such that every email gets
signed by PGP. But this always sets the MIME type accordingly.
6.3.101. pgp_autosign
Here's another. All the other PGP-signed emails in the thead parsed
fine. Just this one was like this, every time.
--
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 31 11:18:42 2001
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http
* Ken Weingold [EMAIL PROTECTED] [31-10-2001 18:13]:
| Here's another. All the other PGP-signed emails in the thead parsed
| fine. Just this one was like this, every time.
This one was not pgp/mime signed, but traditional. Did you press
escP when this happened?
| From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed
PROTECTED]
Subject: another PGP error
Mail-Followup-To: mutt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i
Here's another. All the other PGP-signed emails in the thead parsed
fine. Just this one was like this, every time.
--
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 31 11:18:42 2001
Thus spake Stephen E. Hargrove ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
anyone know where i can get a copy of gpg.rc?
Although this isn't that file directly, you might be interested in this:
http://codesorcery.net/mutt/
--
Justin R. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP/GnuPG Key ID 0xC9C40C31 (preferred
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2001 21:04:51 -0600
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PGP
From: Stephen E. Hargrove [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i'm trying to get mutt working with GnuPGP. mutt.org states:
Go to the contrib subdirectory of the source tree. You'll find
three files there, pgp2.rc, pgp5.rc
Hi, mutt-users!
(I lost the original posting, so excuse the lost reference.)
A week ago Justin asked how to check automatically traditional
signed/crypted mails. He had the problem that mutt seems to go into an
endless loop. I tried to figure it out and I got the same results, even
with
reason without ever getting to the pager view. I figured I'd let it sit
and see if anyone else had ideas, in the meantime binding
check-pgp-traditional to an easier keybinding ;-)
--
Justin R. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP/GnuPG Key ID 0xC9C40C31 (preferred)
PGP signature
A. |
| Shoaff|
___
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
| Version: 3.1 |
| GJ/IT d- s: a C+++$ UL P+++ L+++ E--- W++|
| N+@ o K- w O- M- V PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t+@ 5@ X
501 - 600 of 1369 matches
Mail list logo
