Thomas Roessler wrote:
>
> On 2000-07-24 12:48:45 +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > that is, subheader part is not crlf terminated (but the
> > intervening blank line is).
>
> Have you tried to verify the signatures with NAI's pgp5 or pgp6?
>
> My guess about the cause of the problem would
On 2000-07-24 12:48:45 +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> that is, subheader part is not crlf terminated (but the
> intervening blank line is).
Have you tried to verify the signatures with NAI's pgp5 or pgp6?
My guess about the cause of the problem would be that gnupg
mis-handles some of the can
Suppose I have following signed text with mutt:
--7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
This is a test message.
--7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z
I can verify following test by hand:
cat >former
