ok ... might be quite slow, I never relly realized this because I have a
quite fast connection ... so I am really happy with this. But I can
believe having a modem and no local NNTPd might be a pain. I used leafnode
the days I still had a modem ... maybe this helps ;-))
No, I don't
On 08/10/01 12:42 AM, Christian Ordig sat at the `puter and typed:
ok ... might be quite slow, I never relly realized this because I have a
quite fast connection ... so I am really happy with this. But I can
believe having a modem and no local NNTPd might be a pain. I used leafnode
On Sun, Aug 05, 2001 at 10:54:25PM -0400, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
When I connect to an nntp server, Mutt checks for new messages and new
newsgroups. Due to the nature of nntp, coupled with M1s 'who the hell
uses usenet anyway' attitude (LOW priority), this can be a little
slow.
.
.
.
Does
On 08/07/01 11:59 PM, Christian Ordig sat at the `puter and typed:
On Sun, Aug 05, 2001 at 10:54:25PM -0400, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
When I connect to an nntp server, Mutt checks for new messages and new
newsgroups. Due to the nature of nntp, coupled with M1s 'who the hell
uses usenet
Louis LeBlanc [mutt-users] 07/08/01 18:56 -0400:
I REALLY don't care to start running my own nntp service, especially
I'm the only one on my machine that would be using it. Sure, I could
extend the expiration if I wanted, but . . .
I'd suggest using slrnpull + slrn then.
-suresh
Hey all. I am using the VVV NNTP patch with mutt 1.3.20. I am
noticing some odd behavior - more like behavior I kind of disagree
with.
When I connect to an nntp server, Mutt checks for new messages and new
newsgroups. Due to the nature of nntp, coupled with M1s 'who the hell
uses usenet
