Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] asked:
Anyone got the equivelant Procmail recipe for dumping mail if
it's text/html ot not addressed to you? I use this to get the
latter:
:0:
* !(^[EMAIL PROTECTED])
~/Mail/Other/suspect
Which works fine, adding the ability to weed out html would
make it
I suppose it's equally valid for them to say, I, the sender, should be able
to control how a message is presented to you.
No, that's the whole point, because with email the (time, money) extra
expense associated with downloading useless html formatting is paid by the
receiver, not the
Hello Nick,
* Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020123 17:56]:
and talking of bad communicators, it's been killing me trying to work
out what IMHO stands for? Is there a site that lists all these little
jobbies?
if you are using Debian, you can install the dictd Dictionary Server,
the dict
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* and then Thomas Huemmler blurted
if you are using Debian, you can install the dictd Dictionary Server,
the dict Client and the Jargon File with the command
Hmmm... Actually I'm RedHat but I'm sure I can do something similar,
I've
On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 12:47:25PM -0500, Thomas E. Dickey wrote:
the colors are fixable - what is painful for html email regarding mutt is
that since the html attachments don't show up except as a single line, I
tend to delete the email before reading it. (There are inevitably some
people
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* and then Gary Johnson blurted
It depends on how you have mutt configured. I have my mailcap file and
auto_view command set up to display HTML attachments as plain text in
mutt's pager and have display_filter set to remove the [-- ... --]
2. I got tired of explaining text-only MUAs to them only to receive
comments like, I guess Unix isn't very good if it can't even
display different colors and fonts like my PC can. When are you
guys going to start using Windows?
It all comes down to who should be in control --
So sprach »Nick Wilson« am 2002-01-23 um 18:04:08 +0100 :
find clicking a link in an email easier than pasting it into a browser.
It /is/ easier. They're just not aware of the down points of html mail.
Well, sure it is - however don't all the HTML capable MUAs convert texts
like
Alas! Alexander Skwar spake thus:
Well, sure it is - however don't all the HTML capable MUAs convert texts
like http://this-is-not.a.link.de into a clickable link? Mozilla does.
Mutt highlights that as a mail, and urlview recognizes it as a link. No
need for HTML-enabled mailers at all. Not
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 05:49:27PM +0100, Nick Wilson wrote:
* and then Gary Johnson blurted
It depends on how you have mutt configured. I have my mailcap file and
auto_view command set up to display HTML attachments as plain text in
mutt's pager and have display_filter set to remove
Rob, et al --
...and then Feztaa said...
%
% Alas! Alexander Skwar spake thus:
% Well, sure it is - however don't all the HTML capable MUAs convert texts
% like http://this-is-not.a.link.de into a clickable link? Mozilla does.
%
% Mutt highlights that as a mail, and urlview recognizes it as
Alas! Gary Johnson spake thus:
2. I got tired of explaining text-only MUAs to them only to receive
comments like, I guess Unix isn't very good if it can't even
display different colors and fonts like my PC can. When are you
guys going to start using Windows?
Yeah, Unix really
So sprach »David T-G« am 2002-01-24 um 14:48:30 -0500 :
... and even clickable if you're running under eterm, IIRC. Check the
gnome-term (and I think also the KDE konsole) also feature this.
Alexander Skwar
--
How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english)
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 06:18:43PM -0500 I heard the voice of
Brian Clark, and lo! it spake thus:
:0:
* ^From.*pc-html-user@domain\.com
/dev/null
Actually, I've found that this:
if(/^Content-Type: text\/html/)
to $MBOXDIR/crap
catches more of my spam than any other of my off-the-cuff
* Matthew D. Fuller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Jan 24. 2002 18:29]:
Actually, I've found that this:
if(/^Content-Type: text\/html/)
to $MBOXDIR/crap
catches more of my spam than any other of my off-the-cuff heuristics
(I mean, like at factor of 2 more, and seemingly more than the rest
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 17:36:28 -0600
From: Jeremy Blosser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OT] html email
On Jan 24, Matthew D. Fuller [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Actually, I've found that this:
if(/^Content-Type: text\/html/)
to $MBOXDIR/crap
catches
* Brian Clark ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Jan 24. 2002 18:54]:
But to make this semi-OT:
D'oh, make that `semi-On-Topic'
--
Brian Clark | Avoiding the general public since 1805!
Fingerprint: 07CE FA37 8DF6 A109 8119 076B B5A2 E5FB E4D0 C7C8
Stop searching forever. Happiness is unattainable.
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 18:42:05 -0500
From: Brian Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OT] html email
* Matthew D. Fuller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Jan 24. 2002 18:29]:
snip
If it catches a friend, newletter, etc, I just add the sender's address
to a file called
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 05:49:27PM +0100, Nick Wilson wrote:
2. I got tired of explaining text-only MUAs to them only to receive
comments like, I guess Unix isn't very good if it can't even
display different colors and fonts like my PC can. When are you
guys going to start
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* and then Brian Clark blurted
:0:
* ^From.*pc-html-user@domain\.com
/dev/null
Save yourself from having to explain further. :-)
Hehe, yeah, that'd do it!
- --
Nick Wilson
Tel:+45 3325 0688
Fax:+45 3325 0677
Web:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* and then Roman Neuhauser blurted
Like this?
if(/^Content-Type: text\/html/ hasaddr([EMAIL PROTECTED]))
to $MBOXDIR/crap
X-Warning: had a few beers.
Anyone got the equivelant Procmail recipe for dumping mail
Alas! Nick Wilson spake thus:
Anyone got the equivelant Procmail recipe for dumping mail if it's
text/html ot not addressed to you? I use this to get the latter:
:0:
* !(^[EMAIL PROTECTED])
~/Mail/Other/suspect
Which works fine, adding the ability to weed out html would make it
much
Alas! Matthew D. Fuller spake thus:
I agree with that. Seems to me like the only people who would prefer
HTML mail would be the PHBs who like the pretty colors and pictures
embedded in it.
That would be The ones who spend the money, right?
Uhhh... shutup.
;)
Just because they're the
On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 01:45:37PM -0700 I heard the voice of
Rob 'Feztaa' Park, and lo! it spake thus:
Just because they're the ones that spend the money, doesn't mean they
know what to spend it on!
'Course not!
That's why the helpful salesdroids send them the pretty fluffy friendly
24 matches
Mail list logo
