Re: Archivation through mutt?

2001-09-25 Thread darren chamberlain
Matìj Cepl [EMAIL PROTECTED] said something to this effect on 09/25/2001: I have worked on archmail script a little bit yesterday and the results are attached (I used zip to ensure verbatim transport). I have divided script into two, because I was not able to debugg your find command.

Re: Archivation through mutt?

2001-09-25 Thread Mariusz Drozdziel
On wto, 25 wrz, in tucznik.ml.mutt-users, you wrote: mail $ test -f ./sluzebni/; echo $? 1 mail $ test -d ./sluzebni/; echo $? 0 If understand my bash manpage well, the second command should produce 1 too. Have you any idea why it doesn't? I am using bash No,

test command in shell (was Re: Archivation through mutt?)

2001-09-25 Thread Olaf Schulz
Hallo Matj, I did not read your script but I want to answer your shell question: On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 11:15:32AM -0400, Matj Cepl wrote: [...mail archival script...] I have divided script into two, because I was not able to debugg your find command. However, I have now problem with

Re: Archivation through mutt?

2001-09-07 Thread Piet Delport
--H1spWtNR+x+ondvy Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6 Content-Disposition: inline --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 06 Sep 2001 at 23:43:41 -0400, Matej Cepl

Re: Archivation through mutt?

2001-09-06 Thread Piet Delport
--M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 05 Sep 2001 at 14:39:40 -0400, Matej Cepl wrote: [...mail archival script...] =20 However, I am really not a programmer and I am still slightly scare of