Re: GPG / PGP verification problem

2001-08-24 Thread Ailbhe Leamy
On (23/08/01 14:43), Josh Huber wrote: I suspect that his version of libc wasn't new enough, so apt wants to upgrade it, pulling in a shit ton of other upgrades. should work fine though :) His? that's what you get for running sid (or maybe woody?) What should I run? OK, more specific:

Re: GPG / PGP verification problem

2001-08-24 Thread Ailbhe Leamy
On (22/08/01 19:03), Justin R. Miller wrote: Thus spake Ailbhe Leamy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): . . . mutt tells me, just below the status bar, that PGP signature could NOT be verified. Although it has, in fact, been verified. Is this a wetware error, or a Real Bug? If you're using

Re: GPG / PGP verification problem

2001-08-24 Thread Justin R. Miller
Thus spake Ailbhe Leamy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Just upgraded to Mutt 1.3.20i (2001-07-24) and still have the same problem. Hmm, I wonder if it's related to this, but still affected 1.3.20? http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mutt-users/message/20007 -Justin -- [ ] -- Justin R. Miller -

Re: GPG / PGP verification problem

2001-08-24 Thread Ailbhe Leamy
On (24/08/01 10:39), Justin R. Miller wrote: Hmm, I wonder if it's related to this, but still affected 1.3.20? http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mutt-users/message/20007 Setting this worked. set pgp_good_sign=^gpg: Good signature from Many thanks! Ailbhe -- Homepage:

Re: GPG / PGP verification problem

2001-08-23 Thread Brendan Cully
On Thursday, 23 August 2001 at 18:24, Ailbhe Leamy wrote: On (22/08/01 19:03), Justin R. Miller wrote: Thus spake Ailbhe Leamy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Is this a wetware error, or a Real Bug? If you're using 1.3.18 as your mail headers say, then I'd recommend you try 1.3.20 or 1.3.21,

Re: GPG / PGP verification problem

2001-08-23 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Ailbhe Leamy mutt [23/08/01 18:24 +0100]: # apt-get install mutt Reading Package Lists... Done cd /usr/ports/mail/mutt-devel make install clean Less than ten minutes on my (extremely thin) pipe to the 'net hth --suresh [yes, you have to switch to freebsd, but that's a minor detail g]

Re: GPG / PGP verification problem

2001-08-23 Thread Josh Huber
Brendan Cully [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Version: 1.3.20-1 Replaces: mutt-i Provides: mail-reader Depends: libc6 (= 2.2.3-7), libncurses5 (= 5.2.20010310-1), ^^ libsasl7, exim | mail-transport-agent Recommends: mime-support Suggests: i18ndata, urlview, ispell,

Re: GPG / PGP verification problem

2001-08-23 Thread Ailbhe Leamy
On (23/08/01 23:38), Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: Ailbhe Leamy mutt [23/08/01 18:24 +0100]: # apt-get install mutt Reading Package Lists... Done cd /usr/ports/mail/mutt-devel make install clean [yes, you have to switch to freebsd, but that's a minor detail g] I'm way too lazy to look

Re: GPG / PGP verification problem

2001-08-22 Thread Justin R. Miller
Thus spake Ailbhe Leamy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): . . . mutt tells me, just below the status bar, that PGP signature could NOT be verified. Although it has, in fact, been verified. Is this a wetware error, or a Real Bug? If you're using 1.3.18 as your mail headers say, then I'd recommend you