Alexander Skwar wrote:
Rather often I get mails with attachments where the attachment is of
type application/octet-stream instead of the correct type (let's say
image/png) However, the attached file still has the correct extension
(eg png or PNG)
i think you need either the appoct patch
On 2002-03-01 Will Yardley wrote:
Alexander Skwar wrote:
Rather often I get mails with attachments where the attachment is of
type application/octet-stream instead of the correct type (let's say
image/png). However, the attached file still has the correct extension
(eg. .png or
Christoph Maurer wrote:
What does this patch do and where can I get it?
i'm not sure where it's from; i put up a copy at:
http://veggiechinesenet/021_patch-1324appoct2
Any advantages in comparison to:
http://wwwdaveporg/mutt/muttoctetfilter
i don't use either, so i can't give a
On 2002-03-01 Will Yardley wrote:
Christoph Maurer wrote:
What does this patch do and where can I get it?
i'm not sure where it's from; i put up a copy at:
http://veggiechinese.net/021_patch-1.3.24.appoct.2
Many thanks, I'll give it a try...
Regards,
Christoph
--
Christoph Maurer
On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 10:57:17AM +0100, Christoph Maurer wrote:
On 2002-03-01 Will Yardley wrote:
Alexander Skwar wrote:
Rather often I get mails with attachments where the attachment is of
type application/octet-stream instead of the correct type (let's say
image/png).
On 2002-03-01 Gary Johnson wrote:
On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 10:57:17AM +0100, Christoph Maurer wrote:
On 2002-03-01 Will Yardley wrote:
Alexander Skwar wrote:
Rather often I get mails with attachments where the attachment is of
type application/octet-stream instead of the correct
