On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 08:04:11PM -0400, PeterKorman wrote:
Here are the gory details. Much of my communication is not through
mailing lists. As a rule I don't go to a folder to exchange mail with
a particular person.
that's what I meant ... nearly nobody has one folder per person.
I want
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 01:40:27PM +0200, Christian Ordig wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 08:04:11PM -0400, PeterKorman wrote:
Here are the gory details. Much of my communication is not through
mailing lists. As a rule I don't go to a folder to exchange mail with
a particular person.
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 03:48:39AM +0200, René Clerc wrote:
* PeterKorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [17-09-2002 19:21]:
I think I can correctly interpret what you said in more than 1 way.
So I wont try.
given:
1)message to Sally
2)reply from Sally
3)reply to reply from Sally.
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 12:42:17AM +0200, Christian Ordig wrote:
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 03:48:39AM +0200, René Clerc wrote:
* PeterKorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [17-09-2002 19:21]:
I think I can correctly interpret what you said in more than 1 way.
So I wont try.
given:
On Wed 18-Sep-2002 at 12:45:21AM -0400, PeterKorman wrote:
I guess I need a kind of virtual folder that joins my outgoing
and incoming without duplicating any data.
That isn't possible with mutt
I guess since I'm running on linux, with Maildir, I could brute
force the solution
Peter,
please send your questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED]!
* PeterKorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [17-09-2002 18:21]:
Is there a way to thread full (non news group) conversations
without duplicating and maintaining 2 copies of every message
I send? Thanks.
I use procmail (which puts incoming mails
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 06:43:56PM +0200, René Clerc wrote:
Peter,
please send your questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED]!
Oops!
* PeterKorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [17-09-2002 18:21]:
Is there a way to thread full (non news group) conversations
without duplicating and maintaining 2 copies of
On Tue 17-Sep-2002 at 01:20:09 -0400, PeterKorman wrote:
My current method places messages 1 and 3 in my sent folder.
Message 2 goes into my inbox.
I could automatically put everything I send in both my inbox
and my sent folder.
That would solve the thread problem. But would duplicate
* PeterKorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [17-09-2002 19:21]:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 06:43:56PM +0200, René Clerc wrote:
I use procmail (which puts incoming mails in the correct folder)
in combo with fcc-hooks (which put outgoing mails in the same folder)
Is this what you meant?
I think I
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 06:39:08PM +0100, Bruno Postle wrote:
On Tue 17-Sep-2002 at 01:20:09 -0400, PeterKorman wrote:
My current method places messages 1 and 3 in my sent folder.
Message 2 goes into my inbox.
I could automatically put everything I send in both my inbox
and my sent
10 matches
Mail list logo
