Re: line editor command history behavior

2001-12-09 Thread Cliff Sarginson
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 05:46:41PM +1100, Doug Kearns wrote: On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 09:06:42AM +0100, Cliff Sarginson wrote: On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 04:20:03PM +1100, Doug Kearns wrote: I've just noticed that if you are cycling through the command history and abort with a ^G, the next

Re: line editor command history behavior

2001-12-08 Thread Doug Kearns
On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 09:06:42AM +0100, Cliff Sarginson wrote: On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 04:20:03PM +1100, Doug Kearns wrote: I've just noticed that if you are cycling through the command history and abort with a ^G, the next time you invoke the line editor you are placed at the point in

Re: line editor command history behavior

2001-12-04 Thread Cliff Sarginson
On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 04:20:03PM +1100, Doug Kearns wrote: I've just noticed that if you are cycling through the command history and abort with a ^G, the next time you invoke the line editor you are placed at the point in history list at which you aborted. example: :command 1 :command