Re: why is there no auto $ (save changes to mailbox)?

2009-08-13 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Marc Vaillant wrote: Can't this easily be controlled? set delete=ask-yes. If that's not enough, it suggests that deleting messages should be abstracted from sync-mailbox so that you can sync flags and delete messages independently. Loosing reply flags on e.g. support email--where

Re: why is there no auto $ (save changes to mailbox)?

2009-08-13 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Rejo Zenger wrote: If it's off by default, I think this functionality would be a usefull addition. It's not something I am missing now per se, but I would consider start using it when it's available. The problem with adding new options for features is that if you don't follow the

Re: why is there no auto $ (save changes to mailbox)?

2009-08-12 Thread Rejo Zenger
++ 11/08/09 18:41 +0200 - Rocco Rutte: I can't think of a reason why this would be bad (especialy if it's configurable and the default is off). [...] For eexample, you tag tag delete messages and cover messages you didn't want, or have hooks like me that mark duplicates for duplication which

Re: why is there no auto $ (save changes to mailbox)?

2009-08-11 Thread ed
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 09:23:59AM -0400, Marc Vaillant wrote: Hi all, I've been a happy mutt user for over a decade. Of course there are a few minor features here and there that I wish mutt had. The one that's really getting to me lately is that as far as I know, there is no automatic

Re: why is there no auto $ (save changes to mailbox)?

2009-08-11 Thread Joost Kremers
ed schrieb: On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 09:23:59AM -0400, Marc Vaillant wrote: particularly a problem for IMAP because losing your internet connection (e.g. sleeping your laptop) usually means losing mailbox changes. Personally, I'd use screen :) which, however, doesn't solve the problem

Re: why is there no auto $ (save changes to mailbox)?

2009-08-11 Thread Marc Vaillant
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 09:10:49AM +, ed wrote: On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 09:23:59AM -0400, Marc Vaillant wrote: Hi all, I've been a happy mutt user for over a decade. Of course there are a few minor features here and there that I wish mutt had. The one that's really getting to me

Re: why is there no auto $ (save changes to mailbox)?

2009-08-11 Thread Marc Vaillant
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 07:26:57AM +0200, Rejo Zenger wrote: ++ 10/08/09 16:44 +0200 - Michael Tatge: there is no automatic way to execute $. i.e. save changes to mailbox. This is particularly a problem for IMAP because losing your internet connection (e.g. sleeping your laptop) usually

Re: why is there no auto $ (save changes to mailbox)?

2009-08-11 Thread Rocco Rutte
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 07:26:57AM +0200, Rejo Zenger wrote: No messages will be auto deleted. The only thing that happens is that messages you earlier have marked as to be deleted will be actually deleted. Or better, any changes you have made to the status of the message is comitted.

Re: why is there no auto $ (save changes to mailbox)?

2009-08-11 Thread Marc Vaillant
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 06:41:51PM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote: On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 07:26:57AM +0200, Rejo Zenger wrote: No messages will be auto deleted. The only thing that happens is that messages you earlier have marked as to be deleted will be actually deleted. Or better, any

Re: why is there no auto $ (save changes to mailbox)?

2009-08-10 Thread Marc Vaillant
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 04:44:57PM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote: * On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 09:23AM -0400 Marc Vaillant * (vaill...@fastmail.fm) muttered: there is no automatic way to execute $. i.e. save changes to mailbox. This is particularly a problem for IMAP because losing your internet

Re: why is there no auto $ (save changes to mailbox)?

2009-08-10 Thread Marc Vaillant
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 04:44:57PM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote: * On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 09:23AM -0400 Marc Vaillant * (vaill...@fastmail.fm) muttered: there is no automatic way to execute $. i.e. save changes to mailbox. This is particularly a problem for IMAP because losing your internet

Re: why is there no auto $ (save changes to mailbox)?

2009-08-10 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Monday, August 10 at 12:34 PM, quoth Marc Vaillant: If you want such a feature you always make a macro that does that. e.g. macro index display-messagesync-mailbox mutt errors on this macro. That's because it's incomplete. You have to insert

Re: why is there no auto $ (save changes to mailbox)?

2009-08-10 Thread Marc Vaillant
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 12:11:27PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: On Monday, August 10 at 12:34 PM, quoth Marc Vaillant: If you want such a feature you always make a macro that does that. e.g. macro index display-messagesync-mailbox mutt errors on this macro. That's because it's incomplete.

Re: why is there no auto $ (save changes to mailbox)?

2009-08-10 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Monday, August 10 at 01:27 PM, quoth Marc Vaillant: On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 12:11:27PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: On Monday, August 10 at 12:34 PM, quoth Marc Vaillant: If you want such a feature you always make a macro that does that. e.g.

Re: why is there no auto $ (save changes to mailbox)?

2009-08-10 Thread Rejo Zenger
++ 10/08/09 16:44 +0200 - Michael Tatge: there is no automatic way to execute $. i.e. save changes to mailbox. This is particularly a problem for IMAP because losing your internet connection (e.g. sleeping your laptop) usually means losing mailbox changes. No, there isn't. And that's a good