Re: Rolling in sidebar, other mutt-ng type bits?

2008-11-15 Thread tchomby
Now here's a weird thing. I'm using mutt 1.5.18 right now (on ubuntu 8.10) to read my gmail account over imap, I don't have the sidebar patch installed, and I'm finding that if I press 'y' I get taken to a list of all my imap folders (these have not been listed by me in the muttrc, mutt is

Re: Rolling in sidebar, other mutt-ng type bits?

2008-11-15 Thread tchomby
Ofcourse, I forgot to attach that muttrc file. On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 04:03:44PM +, tchomby wrote: Now here's a weird thing. I'm using mutt 1.5.18 right now (on ubuntu 8.10) to read my gmail account over imap, I don't have the sidebar patch installed, and I'm finding that if I press

Re: Rolling in sidebar, other mutt-ng type bits?

2008-10-30 Thread Christian Ebert
* Sander Smeenk on Thursday, October 30, 2008 at 00:48:34 +0100 Quoting tchomby ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): It's a shame the sidebar patch is so problematic. What do mutt users who don't use the sidebar patch do instead? Then i have this macro for the default 'c' command change-folder: macro

Re: Rolling in sidebar, other mutt-ng type bits?

2008-10-30 Thread Sander Smeenk
Quoting Christian Ebert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): macro index c change-folder?entertab There's also the poor man's sidebar already configured in the default system Muttrc: macro index,pager y change-folder?toggle-mailboxes show incoming mailboxes list bind browser y exit Oh, right. Much like

Re: Rolling in sidebar, other mutt-ng type bits?

2008-10-29 Thread Derek Martin
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 10:04:37PM +0100, Anders Karlsson wrote: mutt 1.5.18; use set nomark_old Works with imap(s), maildir and mbox. I have it running here. ;-) What I have not tried is MH folders, because I have never had a reason to. I'm quite sure you're mistaken: :set ?nomark_old

Re: Rolling in sidebar, other mutt-ng type bits?

2008-10-29 Thread Derek Martin
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 10:19:38PM +0100, Anders Karlsson wrote: * Derek Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20081028 21:07]: On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 11:46:38AM +0100, Anders Karlsson wrote: As long as you specify your mailfolders with mailboxes, you can use c or y to change to a folder with new

Re: Rolling in sidebar, other mutt-ng type bits?

2008-10-29 Thread Sander Smeenk
Quoting tchomby ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): It's a shame the sidebar patch is so problematic. What do mutt users who don't use the sidebar patch do instead? I have about 10 or 15 mailinglists delivered directly to my ~/Maildir using Exim. With 'Exim Filters', messages get filtered to the correct

Re: Rolling in sidebar, other mutt-ng type bits?

2008-10-28 Thread Derek Martin
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 11:31:20PM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote: So pressing 'c' doesn't bring up next mailbox with new mail? The answer is maybe -- it depends on what mail folder format you're using, and also what exactly you consider to be new mail. If you're using mbox folders, and you've

Re: Rolling in sidebar, other mutt-ng type bits?

2008-10-28 Thread Derek Martin
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 11:46:38AM +0100, Anders Karlsson wrote: * tchomby [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20081025 13:04]: It's a shame the sidebar patch is so problematic. [...] As long as you specify your mailfolders with mailboxes, you can use c or y to change to a folder with new mail or get quick

Re: Rolling in sidebar, other mutt-ng type bits?

2008-10-28 Thread Robin Lee Powell
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 04:05:55PM -0400, Derek Martin wrote: I have always wanted mutt to have a 3-paned design, much like most any modern GUI-oriented mail reader. I use wide windows mainly so I can see more of the subject line in the index, so I would want a top pane which is the full

Re: Rolling in sidebar, other mutt-ng type bits?

2008-10-28 Thread Patrick Ben Koetter
* Robin Lee Powell [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 04:05:55PM -0400, Derek Martin wrote: I have always wanted mutt to have a 3-paned design, much like most any modern GUI-oriented mail reader. I use wide windows mainly so I can see more of the subject line in the index, so I

Re: Rolling in sidebar, other mutt-ng type bits?

2008-10-28 Thread Anders Karlsson
* Derek Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20081028 20:48]: On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 11:31:20PM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote: So pressing 'c' doesn't bring up next mailbox with new mail? The answer is maybe -- it depends on what mail folder format you're using, and also what exactly you consider to

Re: Rolling in sidebar, other mutt-ng type bits?

2008-10-28 Thread Anders Karlsson
* Derek Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20081028 21:07]: On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 11:46:38AM +0100, Anders Karlsson wrote: As long as you specify your mailfolders with mailboxes, you can use c or y to change to a folder with new mail or get quick overview of the folders with new mail. You just

Re: Rolling in sidebar, other mutt-ng type bits?

2008-10-26 Thread Chris Bannister
[Please don't top-post. Instead, remove quoted material that you're not replying to, and reply inline to the points you're responding to.] On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 12:03:24PM +0100, tchomby wrote: It's a shame the sidebar patch is so problematic. What do mutt users who don't use the sidebar

Re: Rolling in sidebar, other mutt-ng type bits?

2008-10-26 Thread Anders Karlsson
* tchomby [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20081025 13:04]: It's a shame the sidebar patch is so problematic. What do mutt users who don't use the sidebar patch do instead? The aim is to have a list of folders, which I know mutt can do, and for each folder say how many emails are in it and how many of those

Re: Rolling in sidebar, other mutt-ng type bits?

2008-10-25 Thread tchomby
It's a shame the sidebar patch is so problematic. What do mutt users who don't use the sidebar patch do instead? The aim is to have a list of folders, which I know mutt can do, and for each folder say how many emails are in it and how many of those are unread, or at least say which folders contain

Re: Rolling in sidebar, other mutt-ng type bits?

2008-10-25 Thread Erik Christiansen
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 12:03:24PM +0100, tchomby wrote: It's to solve the problem where you are subscribed to a large number of email lists, for example, and filter mail from each list into its own folder, then you don't want to have to open each folder just to see if there's anything new in

Re: Rolling in sidebar, other mutt-ng type bits?

2008-10-25 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday, October 25 at 09:36 PM, quoth Erik Christiansen: On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 12:03:24PM +0100, tchomby wrote: It's to solve the problem where you are subscribed to a large number of email lists, for example, and filter mail from each list

Rolling in sidebar, other mutt-ng type bits?

2008-10-23 Thread Robin Lee Powell
I was interested in mutt-ng for the sidebar and the header caching. I gather there's now another sidebar patch. Is there some reason it, and anything else useful from mutt-ng, hasn't been rolled into mutt proper? The sidebar in particular sure seems like a really, really nice feature. Does

Re: Rolling in sidebar, other mutt-ng type bits?

2008-10-23 Thread Christian Ebert
* Robin Lee Powell on Thursday, October 23, 2008 at 14:23:24 -0700 Does current mutt have header caching? yes c -- \black\trash movie_C O W B O Y_ _C A N O E_ _C O M A_ Welturaufführung -- http://www.blacktrash.org/underdogma/ccc.html World première --

Re: Rolling in sidebar, other mutt-ng type bits?

2008-10-23 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday, October 23 at 02:23 PM, quoth Robin Lee Powell: I gather there's now another sidebar patch. Oh? Are you sure you aren't getting confused by the transfer of maintainer from Thomer M. Gil to Terry P. Chan? Is there some reason it, and

Re: Rolling in sidebar, other mutt-ng type bits?

2008-10-23 Thread Robin Lee Powell
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 05:51:28PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: On Thursday, October 23 at 02:23 PM, quoth Robin Lee Powell: I gather there's now another sidebar patch. Oh? Are you sure you aren't getting confused by the transfer of maintainer from Thomer M. Gil to Terry P. Chan? mutt-ng had

Re: Rolling in sidebar, other mutt-ng type bits?

2008-10-23 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday, October 23 at 04:08 PM, quoth Robin Lee Powell: mutt-ng had a sidebar feature; I have no idea if that's the same code as the one at http://www.lunar-linux.org/index.php?option=com_contenttask=viewid=44 , which is what I was

Re: Rolling in sidebar, other mutt-ng type bits?

2008-10-23 Thread Robin Lee Powell
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 09:34:58PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: I don't know *authoritatively*, but I believe there are two answers: the first being backwards compatibility (i.e. that by default, mutt should behave as it always has, not suddenly start sticking files somewhere; that would be a

Re: Rolling in sidebar, other mutt-ng type bits?

2008-10-23 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday, October 23 at 09:17 PM, quoth Robin Lee Powell: On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 09:34:58PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: I don't know *authoritatively*, but I believe there are two answers: the first being backwards compatibility (i.e. that by

Re: Rolling in sidebar, other mutt-ng type bits?

2008-10-23 Thread Robin Lee Powell
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 11:49:47PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: But shrug; the issue of unexpected privacy breaches is reason enough not to make it default-on. Oh, *totally*. Didn't think of that, and didn't mean to argue with it. -Robin -- They say: The first AIs will be built by the