Florian Lohoff wrote:
I my wet dreams i' encrypting every single message. But mutt is not very
helpful in this. Yes - it can encrypt but i'd like mutt to decide
automatically when it's capable of encrypting the mail (remember
multiple To:, Cc:, Bcc). It would be okay to encrypt a mail if i
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 09:37:46AM -0600, Dale Raby wrote:
I sign most of my messages, even though I only know a few people who
actively use GnuPG/PGP. As I see it, this is one way of promoting
encryption. I.e.: What is that block of gibberish you have at the end
of your emails? That, my
Incoming from Chris Bannister:
Is it true that if you want to correspond with people on windoze who
use outhouse then it becomes tricky?
I. Don't. Care. [about them].
However, it might present a good opportunity to mention Firefox (or
Opera) and Cygwin. Yes, I am (seriously!) biased.
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 01:24:44PM -0600, Will Fiveash wrote:
I have a couple of comments about this:
- Why sign most messages? Unless the information is important for
others to verify that it came from a particular person why add the
bloat of a signature. Beyond this I find it
Incoming from Florian Lohoff:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 01:24:44PM -0600, Will Fiveash wrote:
I have a couple of comments about this:
- Why sign most messages? Unless the information is important for
others to verify that it came from a particular person why add the
bloat of a
I sign most of my messages, even though I only know a few people who
actively use GnuPG/PGP. As I see it, this is one way of promoting
encryption. I.e.: What is that block of gibberish you have at the end
of your emails? That, my friend is my public key. If you have the
right software you can
* Dale Raby daler...@gmail.com [03-06-13 10:39]:
[...]
I see no problem in signing list posts. For those who want to verify
them, its easy to set up, those who don't can ignore them just as
easily. Its not like you are printing them out and reading them from
paper, after all.
Which is the
Incoming from Dale Raby:
encryption. I.e.: What is that block of gibberish you have at the end
of your emails? That, my friend is my public key. If you have the
right software you can verify that I sent you that message, and we can
even send encrypted emails that nobody else can read but
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 09:37:46AM -0600, Dale Raby wrote:
I sign most of my messages, even though I only know a few people who
actively use GnuPG/PGP. As I see it, this is one way of promoting
encryption. I.e.: What is that block of gibberish you have at the end
of your emails? That, my
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 03:22:47PM -0700, Robert Holtzman wrote:
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 09:37:46AM -0600, Dale Raby wrote:
I sign most of my messages, even though I only know a few people who
actively use GnuPG/PGP. As I see it, this is one way of promoting
encryption. I.e.: What is that
Incoming from Robert Holtzman:
Your dreaming. In my experience 99.9% of the replies are why would I
want to?
That's when you get a chance to explain it. Wouldn't it be neat if
you could order weed from your dealer via email? :-O As opposed to
over the phone with ATT forwarding all your
Incoming from Will Fiveash:
As a side note, I wonder if a pgp/gpg signature as proof of authorship
has ever been tested in court? My guess is no.
The legal community considers fax to be cutting edge reliable tech.
--
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 04:35:07PM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
Incoming from Robert Holtzman:
Your dreaming. In my experience 99.9% of the replies are why would I
want to?
That's when you get a chance to explain it. Wouldn't it be neat if
you could order weed from your dealer via email?
On Thursday, 28 February, 2013 at 19:24:44 GMT, Will Fiveash wrote:
- Why sign most messages?
I'd rather everyone/everything use PGP. I sign personal messages, even though I
know the recipient doesn't use PGP, to at least spread awareness of what it is
and that on the off-chance that the
* Stefan Wimmer swim...@xs4all.nl, 2013-03-01 13:31:26 Fri:
* Will Fiveash will.five...@oracle.com [2013-03-01 00:14]:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 05:03:23PM -0600, Will Fiveash wrote:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 03:35:44PM -0500, David Haguenauer wrote:
I patched my copy of mutt so that it will let
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 06:34:03PM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
Will Fiveash wrote:
The why is that you are adding needless bloat to most messages you send.
One person's needless bloat is another's digital signature, I guess.
Yep, just like one salesperson's HTML format e-mail with a
* Will Fiveash will.five...@oracle.com [2013-03-01 00:14]:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 05:03:23PM -0600, Will Fiveash wrote:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 03:35:44PM -0500, David Haguenauer wrote:
* Stefan Wimmer swim...@xs4all.nl, 2013-02-28 12:55:39 Thu:
I recently started to sign all my mails and it
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 01:24:44PM -0600, Will Fiveash wrote:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:55:39PM +0100, Stefan Wimmer wrote:
Hi all,
I recently started to sign all my mails and it took me little time to find
out that you can't delete attachments in signed/encrypted mails ... ;-)
Now
Will Fiveash wrote:
The why is that you are adding needless bloat to most messages you send.
One person's needless bloat is another's digital signature, I guess.
Take for example the message you sent that I'm responding to. Does
anyone care that it actually came from you and wasn't tampered
Hi all,
I recently started to sign all my mails and it took me little time to find out
that you can't delete attachments in signed/encrypted mails ... ;-)
Now I want to automate the way I use crypt_autosign that mutt checks first if
there is an attachment and only signs the mail if that's
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:55:39PM +0100, Stefan Wimmer wrote:
Hi all,
I recently started to sign all my mails and it took me little time to find
out that you can't delete attachments in signed/encrypted mails ... ;-)
Now I want to automate the way I use crypt_autosign that mutt checks
* Will Fiveash will.five...@oracle.com [02-28-13 14:25]:
[...]
I have a couple of comments about this:
- Why sign most messages? Unless the information is important for
others to verify that it came from a particular person why add the
bloat of a signature. Beyond this I find it
* Patrick Shanahan ptilopt...@gmail.com [2013-02-28 20:38]:
* Will Fiveash will.five...@oracle.com [02-28-13 14:25]:
[...]
I have a couple of comments about this:
- Why sign most messages? Unless the information is important for
others to verify that it came from a particular person why add
* Stefan Wimmer swim...@xs4all.nl, 2013-02-28 12:55:39 Thu:
I recently started to sign all my mails and it took me little time
to find out that you can't delete attachments in signed/encrypted
mails ... ;-)
I patched my copy of mutt so that it will let me delete attachments
from encrypted
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 09:30:47PM +0100, Stefan Wimmer wrote:
* Patrick Shanahan ptilopt...@gmail.com [2013-02-28 20:38]:
* Will Fiveash will.five...@oracle.com [02-28-13 14:25]:
[...]
I have a couple of comments about this:
- Why sign most messages? Unless the information is important
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 02:43:36PM -0600, Will Fiveash wrote:
I wasn't referring to you specifically as I see you did publish your
pubkey properly. Instead, I was referring to others (like s.keeling)
that sign everything yet I can not retrieve their pubkey.
I'm actually working with him on
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 03:35:44PM -0500, David Haguenauer wrote:
* Stefan Wimmer swim...@xs4all.nl, 2013-02-28 12:55:39 Thu:
I recently started to sign all my mails and it took me little time
to find out that you can't delete attachments in signed/encrypted
mails ... ;-)
I patched my
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 05:03:23PM -0600, Will Fiveash wrote:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 03:35:44PM -0500, David Haguenauer wrote:
* Stefan Wimmer swim...@xs4all.nl, 2013-02-28 12:55:39 Thu:
I recently started to sign all my mails and it took me little time
to find out that you can't delete
Incoming from Will Fiveash:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:55:39PM +0100, Stefan Wimmer wrote:
I recently started to sign all my mails and it took me little time
to find out that you can't delete attachments in signed/encrypted
mails ... ;-)
Now I want to automate the way I use
Incoming from Will Fiveash:
I wasn't referring to you specifically as I see you did publish your
pubkey properly. Instead, I was referring to others (like s.keeling)
that sign everything yet I can not retrieve their pubkey.
... which is very annoying to me too.
30 matches
Mail list logo
