Re: Timestamps feature

2001-12-31 Thread Felipe Contreras
The reason mutt does this is that a number of new mail notifier programs (such as xbiff and pals) use the modification time to detect the arrival of new mail. If mutt did modify the mtime, then everytime you (for example) deleted an email, you would be notified of having new mail, which I'm

Re: Timestamps feature

2001-12-31 Thread David T-G
Felipe -- ...and then Felipe Contreras said... % % The reason mutt does this is that a number of new mail notifier programs % (such as xbiff and pals) use the modification time to detect the arrival % of new mail. If mutt did modify the mtime, then everytime you (for % example) deleted an

Timestamps feature

2001-12-30 Thread Felipe Contreras
Hi, I really don't get this guys, why mutt whouldn't modify a timestamp after modifying a mbox! And the worst is that it rely on the timestamps to know when there are new msgs. So tell me, is it normal to always get a N flag on all the mboxes until the timestamps are externally modified? If

Re: Timestamps feature

2001-12-30 Thread Benjamin Smith
On Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 10:28:41PM -0600, Felipe Contreras wrote: Hi, I really don't get this guys, why mutt whouldn't modify a timestamp after modifying a mbox! And the worst is that it rely on the timestamps to know when there are new msgs. snip The reason mutt does this is that a