Trying mutt out again with mbox and atime set

2010-06-23 Thread Chris G
I have now got my new server running and I'm testing out mutt with mbox mail storage and with atime set. This message is really just a test message to myself, sorry for the noise. I will however report if it all works or not. -- Chris Green

Re: Trying mutt out again with mbox and atime set

2010-06-23 Thread Chris G
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 09:21:39PM +0100, Chris G wrote: I have now got my new server running and I'm testing out mutt with mbox mail storage and with atime set. This message is really just a test message to myself, sorry for the noise. I will however report if it all works or not. ...,

Re: Trying mutt out again with mbox and atime set

2010-06-23 Thread Michael Ludwig
Chris G schrieb am 23.06.2010 um 21:40 (+0100): I'm confused, what is going on, surely mutt should recognise a *new* file as one that has new mail in it. Why don't you simply use the option Christian suggested yesterday and call it a day? set check_mbox_size = yes I agree the parameter

Re: Trying mutt out again with mbox and atime set

2010-06-23 Thread Chris G
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 09:40:42PM +0100, Chris G wrote: I'm confused, what is going on, surely mutt should recognise a *new* file as one that has new mail in it. ... but maybe it doesn't. In fact how would it recognise a newly created file as one having new mail in it, it typically looks