Drew Raines [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe the suggestion was something to the effect of
send-hook ! . 'my_hdr Blah: foo'
That won't quite work. Internally, Mutt translates the simple pattern
. into ~A, which matches everything. Negating that matches nothing,
which is the effect
* Drew Raines [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-22 18:01]:
What's the equivalent of send-hook when
using the NNTP patch? Is there a followup-hook?
No.
I'd like to add a header for only news postings.
send-hook ! ~t . command
send-hook ~t . command-default
Sven
--
Sven Guckes
What's the equivalent of send-hook when using the NNTP patch? Is there a
followup-hook?
I'd like to add a header for only news postings.
--
Drew
Drew --
...and then Drew Raines said...
%
% What's the equivalent of send-hook when using the NNTP patch? Is there a
% followup-hook?
I don't think that there is any such beast.
%
% I'd like to add a header for only news postings.
This came up just recently. I think Sven Guckes, at
+ David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
An approach that I recall as successful was to set up a send-hook that
only triggered when there is no to: field and set the header in there,
turning it off (or changing it) otherwise if to: can match anything.
I believe the suggestion was something to the
