Dirk Laurie wrote:
The problem is this: by the time vim gets control, the quote sign ""
has already been prepended to the line. I want the line-break algorithm
to do its thing before the "" sign gets prepended.
There's an example of commands to put in your vimrc file that will
automatically
Dirk Laurie wrote:
signs to show that a line break was made by the viewer. However, when
printing or quoting (in a reply) these convenient line breaks are
gone, and the result looks terrible. Can I persuade mutt to use the
viewer-formatted version instead of the original when printing or
Jrgen Salk wrote:
Yes, I have intentionally used overlength lines, such
that you can check it out. Have fun.
Ahem, this bloody damned web interface, I'm using right
now, seems to have it's own idea of breaking lines. :-)
Regards - Juergen.
--
Sent through GMX FreeMail -
how do you do this
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 08:02:11AM +0100, Suresh Ramasubramanian muttered:
| *[Dirk Laurie on Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 08:52:14AM +0200]:
|
| signs to show that a line break was made by the viewer. However, when
| printing or quoting (in a reply) these convenient line
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Dirk Laurie wrote:
Jrgen Salk skryf:
Dirk Laurie wrote:
signs to show that a line break was made by the viewer. However, when
printing or quoting (in a reply) these convenient line breaks are
gone, and the result looks terrible. Can I persuade mutt to use the
Dirk Laurie wrote:
The problem is this: by the time vim gets control, the quote sign ""
has already been prepended to the line. I want the line-break algorithm
to do its thing before the "" sign gets prepended.
I understand quite exactly what you want.
Just try this "gqG" thing with vim
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 08:52:14AM +0200, Dirk Laurie wrote:
Some of my correspondents use a mail composition system that does not
break long lines into screen-width lines. I dare not complain for they
will then send me HTML or Word versions. The mutt viewer handles the
long lines nicely,
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001, Jrgen Salk wrote:
If you edit your mails with vim, you can easily reformat the quoted
lines by the "gq{motion}" command. E.g. "gqj" will format the
current line and places the cursor in the next line. Then proceed
with the "." command. Or just type "gqG" which will
On 2001.02.28, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
"Dirk Laurie" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is this: by the time vim gets control, the quote sign ""
has already been prepended to the line. I want the line-break algorithm
to do its thing before the "" sign gets prepended.
The problem
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 10:49:03AM -0600, David Champion wrote:
On 2001.02.28, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
"Dirk Laurie" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is this: by the time vim gets control, the quote sign ""
has already been prepended to the line.
Try using "par q" to
Try this:
set editor="vim -c 'set tw=72 comments=nb:'"
-Justin
Thus spake Dirk Laurie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
J?rgen Salk skryf:
Dirk Laurie wrote:
signs to show that a line break was made by the viewer. However, when
printing or quoting (in a reply) these convenient line
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 09:57:33AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jed is a very good editor that has a mail_mode that does smart
formatting of quoted paragraphs. No more "" characters in the
middle of lines.
I've always been a big fan of GNUEmacs, and text mode has "" quoting
reformatting
Some of my correspondents use a mail composition system that does not
break long lines into screen-width lines. I dare not complain for they
will then send me HTML or Word versions. The mutt viewer handles the
long lines nicely, breaking at word boundaries and putting in cyan plus
signs to
*[Dirk Laurie on Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 08:52:14AM +0200]:
signs to show that a line break was made by the viewer. However, when
printing or quoting (in a reply) these convenient line breaks are
gone, and the result looks terrible. Can I persuade mutt to use the
viewer-formatted version
14 matches
Mail list logo
