On 2000-01-04 10:40:46 +0100, Martin Schröder wrote:
The year 100 is converted by date_format="%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S %Z"
to 2000. Problem of mutt or of strftime?
I wouldn't really consider this a problem - after all, it cought
quite a bit of y2k-related nonsense emitted by other software, and,
in
On Tue, Jan 04, 2000 at 10:40:46 +0100, Martin Schröder wrote:
On 2000-01-01 19:12:28 +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
Mutt as a small y2k problem on the receiving end. While mutt works
just fine with four-digit year numbers, RFC 822 originally specifies
two-digit year numbers, which still
On Tue, Jan 04, 2000 at 16:02:45 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
Fortunately, time machines don't exist. Otherwise I don't know how
one could write a mail in year 99; perhaps 0099? What is the minimal
year that is accepted?
1970. All times are internally stored as an unsigned integer
showing
