Re: building question

2002-03-11 Thread David T-G
Ken -- ...and then Ken Weingold said... % % I am getting a new shell account where I am limited 50 megs of space. Yikes :-) % Even though I use my own patched version of mutt, they do have it % installed. What I want to do is use the mutt binary from ~/bin, but Cool; that is helpful. %

Re: building question

2002-03-11 Thread darren chamberlain
Quoting Ken Weingold [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Mar 10, 2002 18:05]: I am getting a new shell account where I am limited 50 megs of space. Even though I use my own patched version of mutt, they do have it installed. What I want to do is use the mutt binary from ~/bin, but use the rest of the stuff

building question

2002-03-10 Thread Ken Weingold
I am getting a new shell account where I am limited 50 megs of space. Even though I use my own patched version of mutt, they do have it installed. What I want to do is use the mutt binary from ~/bin, but use the rest of the stuff from the system directories. What is the best way to do this? I

Re: building question

2002-03-10 Thread Knute
On Sun, 10 Mar 2002, Ken Weingold wrote: I am getting a new shell account where I am limited 50 megs of space. Even though I use my own patched version of mutt, they do have it installed. What I want to do is use the mutt binary from ~/bin, but use the rest of the stuff from the system

Re: building question

2002-03-10 Thread Ken Weingold
On Sun, Mar 10, 2002, Knute wrote: On Sun, 10 Mar 2002, Ken Weingold wrote: I am getting a new shell account where I am limited 50 megs of space. Even though I use my own patched version of mutt, they do have it installed. What I want to do is use the mutt binary from ~/bin, but use

Re: building question

2002-03-10 Thread Will Yardley
Knute wrote: On Sun, 10 Mar 2002, Ken Weingold wrote: What I want to do is use the mutt binary from ~/bin, but use the rest of the stuff from the system directories. What is the best way to do this? I am thinking I guess about compile parameters, etc. One option would be to put ~/bin

Re: building question

2002-03-10 Thread Knute
On Sun, 10 Mar 2002, Ken Weingold wrote: On Sun, Mar 10, 2002, Knute wrote: On Sun, 10 Mar 2002, Ken Weingold wrote: [snip] Thanks, but I was thinking more about how mutt will know to look for everything in the system directories. I was thinking of building mutt and just copying the

Re: building question

2002-03-10 Thread David Champion
On 2002.03.10, in [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ken Weingold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks, but I was thinking more about how mutt will know to look for everything in the system directories. I was thinking of building mutt and just copying the binary into ~/bin. My mutt only needs the

Re: building question

2002-03-10 Thread Gary Johnson
On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 03:05:48PM -0800, Ken Weingold wrote: I am getting a new shell account where I am limited 50 megs of space. Even though I use my own patched version of mutt, they do have it installed. What I want to do is use the mutt binary from ~/bin, but use the rest of the stuff