* andrej hocevar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-05-10 08:58]:
> On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 08:09:59AM -0400, darren chamberlain wrote:
> > I just posted a patch that allows for this yesterday (or was it the day
>
> Great; I've found it. Would you please tell me how to apply it?
> I've installed mutt from
Hi,
* andrej hocevar [05/10/02 13:49:17 CEST] wrote:
> how do I instruct mutt to colourize only a certain word in the header
> of a message? I'd like to make for instance the word "From:" appear
> in red, while the text following it in default, i.e. no colour.
> Until now I've failed because mut
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 08:09:59AM -0400, darren chamberlain wrote:
> I just posted a patch that allows for this yesterday (or was it the day
Great; I've found it. Would you please tell me how to apply it?
I've installed mutt from a .deb, so I'll have to go get the source,
right?
andrej
--
ech
* andrej hocevar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-05-10 04:49]:
> how do I instruct mutt to colourize only a certain word in the header
> of a message? I'd like to make for instance the word "From:" appear in
> red, while the text following it in default, i.e. no colour.
I just posted a patch that allow
andrej hocevar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> how do I instruct mutt to colourize only a certain word in the header
> of a message?
No possible without patching mutt.
> Until now I've failed because mutt always coloured the whole line
> upon a successful match.
That's how it is.
Michael
--
Hello,
how do I instruct mutt to colourize only a certain word in the header
of a message? I'd like to make for instance the word "From:" appear
in red, while the text following it in default, i.e. no colour.
Until now I've failed because mutt always coloured the whole line
upon a successful matc
