* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-22 12:45]:
macro pager ,@r13on enter-commandset display_filter=$HOME/local/bin/rot13;macro
pager \\cx ,@r13off 'Toggle ROT13
decoding'\ndisplay-toggle-weeddisplay-toggle-weed
macro pager ,@r13off enter-commandset display_filter=;macro pager \\cx ,@r13on
* Cameron Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-22 12:24:10 +1100]:
Someone has already mentioned his startup file being:
source shell-cmd |
Wouldn't:
macro foo :source shell-cmd|
be general enough to go most algorithmic things without bloating
mutt? The shell hcan hand of
Rocco, et al --
...and then Rocco Rutte said...
%
% Hi,
Hello!
%
% On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 07:25:50:AM -0500 David T-G wrote:
% ...and then Rocco Rutte said...
% %
% % define my-command-1 'mutt-command-1mutt-command-2enter'
...
% (pager, index, compose, ...) to set the scope of
Quoting Nicolas Rachinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Mar 22, 2002 06:20]:
* Cameron Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-22 12:24:10 +1100]:
Someone has already mentioned his startup file being:
source shell-cmd |
Wouldn't:
macro foo :source shell-cmd|
be general enough to
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-21 23:13:28 +0100]:
* Jeremy Blosser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-21 16:49]:
[SNIP scripting in mutt would be nice]
[SNIP Sven swears in public]
Sven [slang, anyone?]
I seem to remember that someone does/did maintain a patch that made mutt
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Dave Pearson wrote:
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-21 23:13:28 +0100]:
* Jeremy Blosser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-21 16:49]:
[SNIP scripting in mutt would be nice]
[SNIP Sven swears in public]
Sven [slang, anyone?]
I seem to remember that
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Thomas E. Dickey wrote:
I seem to remember that someone does/did maintain a patch that made mutt
programmable via slang.
possibly - but I've only seen it mentioned as a possibility that could
be developed rather than an accomplished fact.
speaking of which (since I
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Dave Pearson wrote:
* Thomas E. Dickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-22 10:28:35 -0500]:
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Dave Pearson wrote:
I seem to remember that someone does/did maintain a patch that made mutt
programmable via slang.
possibly - but I've only seen it
Rocco --
...and then Rocco Rutte said...
%
% Hi,
Hello!
%
% On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 06:11:22:PM -0700 Steve Talley wrote:
%
% There's only one thing I really miss: I'd like to be abled to define my
% own commands. Something like:
%
% define my-command-1
* Jeremy Blosser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-21 16:49]:
Anyway, this is probably just one more place where a real internal
scripting backend with variables and loops, etc., would be nice to have.
Everyone knows it, but no one is up to the work yet it seems. ;)
LISP.
There - I've said it.
Sven Guckes wrote:
* Jeremy Blosser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-21 16:49]:
Anyway, this is probably just one more place where a real internal
scripting backend with variables and loops, etc., would be nice to have.
Everyone knows it, but no one is up to the work yet it seems. ;)
LISP.
begin quoting what Michael Elkins said on Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 02:25:46PM -0800:
This converstion comes up every once in a while and devolves into my
programming language is better than yours ultimately.
Just put an INTERCAL interpreter in there.
Or, better yet, befunge. Then you can say
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 07:25:50:AM -0500 David T-G wrote:
...and then Rocco Rutte said...
% There's only one thing I really miss: I'd like to be abled to define my
% own commands. Something like:
%
% define my-command-1 'mutt-command-1mutt-command-2enter'
% define
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 10:56:43:AM -0600 Jeremy Blosser wrote:
Anyway, this is probably just one more place where a real internal
scripting backend with variables and loops, etc., would be nice to have.
Yepp.
Everyone knows it, but no one is up to the work yet it seems. ;)
It would be
14 matches
Mail list logo
