* Cameron Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-22 12:24:10 +1100]:
Someone has already mentioned his startup file being:
source shell-cmd |
Wouldn't:
macro foo :source shell-cmd|
be general enough to go most algorithmic things without bloating
mutt? The shell hcan hand of
Quoting Nicolas Rachinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Mar 22, 2002 06:20]:
* Cameron Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-22 12:24:10 +1100]:
Someone has already mentioned his startup file being:
source shell-cmd |
Wouldn't:
macro foo :source shell-cmd|
be general enough to
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-21 23:13:28 +0100]:
* Jeremy Blosser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-21 16:49]:
[SNIP scripting in mutt would be nice]
[SNIP Sven swears in public]
Sven [slang, anyone?]
I seem to remember that someone does/did maintain a patch that made mutt
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Dave Pearson wrote:
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-21 23:13:28 +0100]:
* Jeremy Blosser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-21 16:49]:
[SNIP scripting in mutt would be nice]
[SNIP Sven swears in public]
Sven [slang, anyone?]
I seem to remember that
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Thomas E. Dickey wrote:
I seem to remember that someone does/did maintain a patch that made mutt
programmable via slang.
possibly - but I've only seen it mentioned as a possibility that could
be developed rather than an accomplished fact.
speaking of which (since I
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Dave Pearson wrote:
* Thomas E. Dickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-22 10:28:35 -0500]:
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Dave Pearson wrote:
I seem to remember that someone does/did maintain a patch that made mutt
programmable via slang.
possibly - but I've only seen it
* Jeremy Blosser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-21 16:49]:
Anyway, this is probably just one more place where a real internal
scripting backend with variables and loops, etc., would be nice to have.
Everyone knows it, but no one is up to the work yet it seems. ;)
LISP.
There - I've said it.
Sven Guckes wrote:
* Jeremy Blosser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-21 16:49]:
Anyway, this is probably just one more place where a real internal
scripting backend with variables and loops, etc., would be nice to have.
Everyone knows it, but no one is up to the work yet it seems. ;)
LISP.
begin quoting what Michael Elkins said on Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 02:25:46PM -0800:
This converstion comes up every once in a while and devolves into my
programming language is better than yours ultimately.
Just put an INTERCAL interpreter in there.
Or, better yet, befunge. Then you can say
