Re: editing headers in vim + clear text signing

2001-10-02 Thread Dominique Pelle
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 12:20:49AM +0200, Piet Delport ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Mon, 01 Oct 2001 at 11:19:43 -0500, David Champion wrote: > > You can do it a bit more elegantly[1] with this ex one-liner: > > 1;/^$/+1,$!gpg --clearsign You might also want to redirect stderr to avoid putt

Re: editing headers in vim + clear text signing

2001-10-01 Thread Wayne Chapeskie
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 12:20:49AM +0200, Piet Delport wrote: > You can do it a bit more elegantly[1] with this ex one-liner: > > 1;/^$/+1,$!gpg --clearsign Back in the old days days of PGP 2.x, someone pointed out that you can use a couple of macros to handle common PGP operations within vi. U

Re: editing headers in vim + clear text signing

2001-10-01 Thread Dave Price
thanks for the great one-liner, piet ... that is why i read these lists aloha, dave On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 12:20:49AM +0200, Piet Delport wrote: > On Mon, 01 Oct 2001 at 11:19:43 -0500, David Champion wrote: > > On 2001.10.01, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > > "Frederik Vanrenterghem" <[EMAIL PRO

Re: editing headers in vim + clear text signing

2001-10-01 Thread Piet Delport
On Mon, 01 Oct 2001 at 11:19:43 -0500, David Champion wrote: > On 2001.10.01, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > "Frederik Vanrenterghem" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm trying out some ways to clear text sign a message in mutt, using > > :%!gpg -eas > > > > Unfortunately, all headers (including

Re: editing headers in vim + clear text signing

2001-10-01 Thread David Champion
On 2001.10.01, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Frederik Vanrenterghem" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm trying out some ways to clear text sign a message in mutt, using > :%!gpg -eas > > Unfortunately, all headers (including "to") are signed, effectively > making these headers useless. Is there

editing headers in vim + clear text signing

2001-10-01 Thread Frederik Vanrenterghem
I'm trying out some ways to clear text sign a message in mutt, using :%!gpg -eas Unfortunately, all headers (including "to") are signed, effectively making these headers useless. Is there a way to specify to this filter only to sign/encrypt the actual message body? -- Frederik Vanrenterghem