A small update on the matter. John was kind enough the send me a
encrypted test email from the iphone app and it worked
perfectly. I could verify signatures and and decrypt it properly from
within mutt automatically without any trouble.
With this in mind I just realized that my friend for weird
Hello! I'm having some trouble decrypting emails from a friend who is
using some kind of Iphone app for PGP.
When I get a encrypted email from this person it usually looks like this:
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 13:06:17 +0100
From: frend friend@...
To: me
Subject: something
[-- Attachment #1 --]
[--
Hi,
* David T-G [2002-06-06 00:22:02 CEST] wrote:
I had the same problem recently and we traced it to the
gpg exit code. It turns out that I had a bogus entry in
my options file that caused gpg to not fail but not exit
cleanly, and mutt noticed that.
Wow, just to be curious, your solution
Rocco, et al --
...and then Rocco Rutte said...
%
% Hi,
Hi!
%
% * David T-G [2002-06-06 00:22:02 CEST] wrote:
%
% I had the same problem recently and we traced it to the
...
%
% Wow, just to be curious, your solution is?
To not declare my default keyring in my list of keyrings, since
i have mutt set up with gpg. when verifying a message, gpg gives the
following output:
[-- PGP output follows (current time: Wed Jun 5 13:45:19 2002) --]
gpg: Signature made Wed Jun 5 13:24:25 2002 MDT using DSA key ID
D654075A
gpg: Good signature from Todd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gpg:
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 01:50:46PM -0600, Peter T. Abplanalp wrote:
i have mutt set up with gpg. when verifying a message, gpg gives the
following output:
[-- PGP output follows (current time: Wed Jun 5 13:45:19 2002) --]
gpg: Signature made Wed Jun 5 13:24:25 2002 MDT using DSA key ID
Hi,
* Peter T. Abplanalp [2002-06-05 21:50:46 CEST] wrote:
i have mutt set up with gpg. when verifying a message,
gpg gives the following output:
[...]
however, mutt then says PGP signature could NOT be
verified. is that because of the warning that the key in
not certified with a trusted
Peter, et al --
...and then Peter T. Abplanalp said...
%
% i have mutt set up with gpg. when verifying a message, gpg gives the
% following output:
%
% [-- PGP output follows (current time: Wed Jun 5 13:45:19 2002) --]
% gpg: Signature made Wed Jun 5 13:24:25 2002 MDT using DSA key ID
...
%
Peter --
...and then David T-G said...
%
...
% I had the same problem recently and we traced it to the gpg exit code.
Forgot to mention that most of it was on-list and therefore is in the
archives. Might be helpful.
HTH HAND
:-D
--
David T-G * It's easier to fight
On Fri 19-Oct-2001 at 07:58:24AM -0600, Charles Curley wrote:
Is anyone using mutt/gpg to change records at Network Solutions using
pgp? I seem unable to send a change to them which their software will
accept. Their error message is less than lucid.
If it's anything like the nic.uk robot,
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 08:17:55AM +0200, Christoph Maurer wrote:
The Problem is not PGP, but Outlook.
Ah? New to me ;)
I defined two macros in my muttrc, so I can encrypt and sign
messages in a way MS Outlook (and a lot of other Windows Email
Clients) understand:
That's what I did too
Andre, et al --
...and then Andre Bonhote said...
% Hi fellows
Hello!
%
% Sorry about asking that (again?), but I didn't find a solution to this
% problem searching the web.
You should have searched the archives ;-) Almost a year ago in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Shane Wegner posted his patch to
This is my first post to this list so I would be out of line to not
start by saying that Mutt is by far the best mail client I've ever
used. Ok, now on to business.
Use Inline Signatures:
set pgp_create_traditional=yes
But note:
[snip]
Also note that using the old-style PGP message
On 2001-09-04 16:22:33 -0500, Ben Jones wrote:
When you say strongly deprecated do you mean by Mutt's standards
or by an official standard. If the latter, would you mind pointing
me to a reference for my reading enjoyment? Not that I'm
challenging you, because I'm not. I'd just like to lessen
Old-style PGP isn't cleanly specified, and has problems with
non-us-ascii character sets. It kind of works when you are doing
text-e-mail in English, but that's all.
PGP/MIME doesn't have this problem, and is cleanly specified (RFC
3156).
I'm reading the RFC now. Thanks for the
Hi fellows
Sorry about asking that (again?), but I didn't find a solution to this
problem searching the web.
I just installed GPG 1.0.6 on my linux box and configured mutt to work
with it. Fine so far. Next, I set up a test win2k box with Outlook
Express, PGP 6.5.8 and later with 7.0.3. Now,
Andre Bonhote wrote:
I just installed GPG 1.0.6 on my linux box and configured mutt to work
with it. Fine so far. Next, I set up a test win2k box with Outlook
Express, PGP 6.5.8 and later with 7.0.3. Now, after exchanging keys
(which are different, for testing purpose), I first tried to
Hi!
On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 12:44:33PM +0200, Volker Moell wrote:
Two Words: outlook! :-(
You missed one word: sucks!
Use Inline Signatures:
set pgp_create_traditional=yes
Does not work.
Note that PGP/MIME will be used automatically for messages which have
a character set
Nils --
FYI, the proper posting address for mutt-users is *NOT* at gbnet, even
though the list is hosted there and the address leaks through sometimes.
...and then Nils Vogels said...
% Hi there!
%
% I have been trying to make gpg dump its keys it fetches while being in mutt in
...
...and
Hi, all --
...and then Nils Vogels said...
%
% set pgp_getkeys_command="gpg --recv-keys --keyring pubkey.import.gpg %r"
%
% only, for some reason, gpg sends out the error, reporting that the email
% adress where the mail comes from is not a valid key-id. IMHO this error is
% quite correct,
Hi there!
I have been trying to make gpg dump its keys it fetches while being in mutt in
a seperate file. To make this happen, I set the following variable in my rc:
set pgp_getkeys_command="gpg --recv-keys --keyring pubkey.import.gpg %r"
only, for some reason, gpg sends out the error,
Hi all,
Does anyone know of a way to get mutt to encrypt mail
to a specific address using _several_ distinct public
keys?
I want to be able to achieve the same effect as you
would expect the following to do:
pgp-hook pattern keyid1 keyid2 keyid3 ...
However, this unfortunately does
22 matches
Mail list logo
