On Tue, Feb 22, 2000 at 12:43:50AM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> I've used cat > /dev/null followed by pressing the key, and seeing
> which characters get printed. This may or may not work for you...
[...]
At least under tcsh (haven't tried it under any other shell), it's as easy
to simply t
John E. Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > If I remember rightly, slang does not use terminfo
>
> It uses terminfo on systems that have it. For others, it uses termcap.
Thanks, I'll stop spreading misinformation now. :)
--
David DeSimone | "The doctrine of human equality reposes on this
David DeSimone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>If I remember rightly, slang does not use terminfo, but termcap instead.
It uses terminfo on systems that have it. For others, it uses
termcap.
--John
Jens Wilhelm Wulf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I thought that the codes from terminfo are the ones programs see (if
> they use it, no matter how it is done), and so it is important that
> terminfo is correct.
The codes you refer to in terminfo are actually strings, whereas the
value KEY_NPAGE i
Jens Wilhelm Wulf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sat, 26 Feb 2000:
> Thanks a lot for the describtion of how keys are handled...it surprises me that
> it's done this way, as there is one layer more than I expected. I thought
> that the codes from terminfo are the ones programs see (if they use it, n
Hi there,
The little program David send (linked to ncurses) returns 0522 and 0523,
both curses.h and ncurses.h look like this:
#define KEY_NPAGE 0522/* Next page */
#define KEY_PPAGE 0523/* Previous page */
So terminfo has to be OK if I understood your expl
Hi David and others,
Thanks a lot for the describtion of how keys are handled...it surprises me that
it's done this way, as there is one layer more than I expected. I thought
that the codes from terminfo are the ones programs see (if they use it, no
matter how it is done), and so it is important
David DeSimone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 25 Feb 2000:
> As you can see, Mutt calls a function called wgetch(), to get a "key"
> from the keyboard. If that function returns 0522, then Mutt knows that
> you pressed the "next page" key, which Mutt calls "".
If you (Jens) really want to debu
Jens Wilhelm Wulf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> now tried xkeycaps and changed keysym from next/prior to
> KP_next/KP_prior. Doesn't help, too.
That's probably because they were already set correctly.
> To finally see what happens it must be possible to make mutt tell me
> which key(sym/code)
Some "news" again...
now tried xkeycaps and changed keysym from next/prior to KP_next/KP_prior.
Doesn't help, too.
To finally see what happens it must be possible to make mutt tell me which
key(sym/code) it sees I can't believe that this should be impossible.
Maybe there's a patch. Doesn't t
> in Mutt, you can press : for "enter command", and then press , and
> then the key for which you want to see the char sequence. The reason
> why you need to press is that the first character from your
> home/pageup/whatever key is likely to be , and Mutt won't display
> that -- but if it receiv
Jens Wilhelm Wulf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 22 Feb 2000:
> > I've used cat > /dev/null followed by pressing the key, and seeing
> > which characters get printed. This may or may not work for you...
> well, if I tell mutt to use those keys, it won´t recognize them, too. Is
> there a way
> I've used cat > /dev/null followed by pressing the key, and seeing
> which characters get printed. This may or may not work for you...
well, if I tell mutt to use those keys, it won´t recognize them, too. Is
there a way to make mutt display the code it sees, like in jed?
> It's possible to
Jens Wilhelm Wulf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 21 Feb 2000:
> I just updated my whole system, now mutt tells me that the keys I mentioned are
> not bound. Well, of course they are, but mutt doesn´t seem to get their
> standard-codes. Is there a possibility to find out which codes mutt receive
I just updated my whole system, now mutt tells me that the keys I mentioned are
not bound. Well, of course they are, but mutt doesn´t seem to get their
standard-codes. Is there a possibility to find out which codes mutt receives so
I can bind them?
I linked mutt against the current slang-version,
15 matches
Mail list logo
