On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 01:47:37PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
Is this too ambitious a wish?
unfortunately, yes.
Ricardo SIGNES is a man of vision, I think. If it is practical to link
in a preferred regex suite, as described in his post on this thread, to
allow the ERE-proficient amongst
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 18:55:42 +1000
From: Erik Christiansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: most commonly used regex lib for awk/frep/mutt/sed?
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 01:47:37PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
Is this too ambitious a wish?
unfortunately, yes
* Erik Christiansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-01 07:48]:
is there any enthusiasm for employing a most commonly
used regex library, such that any improvements can feed
back into all the tools using it?
While procmail seems to be out on a long plank in the
middle of a swamp, it would be
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 01:47:37PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
* Erik Christiansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-01 07:48]:
While procmail seems to be out on a long plank in the
middle of a swamp, it would be cosmically empowering to be
able to move between mutt, vim, awk, and grep without
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 08:22:36AM -0400, Ricardo SIGNES wrote:
echo ~/.muttrc set pcre_acknowledge=on # to avoid PCRE warnings on startup
Ok, so I don't know how to call echo, and s/=on/yes/
Still, you get the picture.
--
rjbs
msg30054/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
