On 2001-09-17 21:22:54 -0400, Justin R. Miller wrote:
In recent devel versions of Mutt, you can hit Esc-P to convert a
message on-the-fly.
In particular, this also works when the PGP-signed or encrypted body
part is an attachment.
--
Thomas Roessler
Hi all
While we're on the subject of GPG, why is it that mutt's method of
signing messages seems to differ from that of every other mailer on the
planet? It doesn't seem to recognize some signatures, either (for
example, those of Jean-Sebastien Morisset on this list) - the text of
the signature
Matt Spong wrote:
While we're on the subject of GPG, why is it that mutt's method of
signing messages seems to differ from that of every other mailer on
the planet? It doesn't seem to recognize some signatures, either (for
example, those of Jean-Sebastien Morisset on this list) - the text of
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 01:53:24AM +0200, Björn Lindström wrote:
I don't use procmail; I use maildrop. What does this procmail recipe do? I
would like to translate it into maildrop.
I think this widely circulated piece of code in your .procmailrc
should take care of that.
Thus spake Will Yardley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
you can set an option to use the old style of encryption; i'm not sure
if there's an easy way to make mutt automatically check signatures that
use the old style method, although i'm sure a quick search on google
would turn up something regarding
I had same annoyance. I made following entry to my .muttrc
to turn on/off GPG/PGP sig check to avoid this annoyance.
macro index S ":toggle pgp_verify_sig\n" # define S to toggle GPG check
If you find better method to deal with this, let me know by cc:
Osamu
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at
