Re: mutt porting to Max OS-X ?

2001-08-18 Thread Jean-Sebastien Morisset
msg.pgp

Re: mutt porting to Max OS-X ?

2001-08-17 Thread Aaron Schrab
At 19:03 -0700 16 Aug 2001, Chris Wong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I compile mutt on Mac OS X myself and there is also a fink package for it. The only problem is sendmail doesn't work out of the box, so I am trying to figure out how set it up on Mac OS X, if anyone of you know how to do that,

Re: mutt porting to Max OS-X ?

2001-08-17 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Aaron Schrab mutt [17/08/01 01:58 -0500]: The main problem with the normal sendmail config on there is that sendmail doesn't like some of the permissions. This can be fixed by adding with the following line in /etc/mail/sendmail.cf: O DontBlameSendmail=GroupWritableDirPathSafe So it's

[OT] Re: mutt porting to Max OS-X ?

2001-08-17 Thread Eugene Lee
On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 01:58:34AM -0500, Aaron Schrab wrote: : : The main problem with the normal sendmail config on there is that : sendmail doesn't like some of the permissions. This can be fixed by : adding with the following line in /etc/mail/sendmail.cf: : : O

Re: mutt porting to Max OS-X ?

2001-08-17 Thread Chris Wong
On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 01:58:34AM -0500, Aaron Schrab wrote: At 19:03 -0700 16 Aug 2001, Chris Wong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I compile mutt on Mac OS X myself and there is also a fink package for it. The only problem is sendmail doesn't work out of the box, so I am trying to figure out

[OT] Re: mutt porting to Max OS-X ?

2001-08-17 Thread Eugene Lee
On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 12:42:55PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: : Aaron Schrab mutt [17/08/01 01:58 -0500]: : : O DontBlameSendmail=GroupWritableDirPathSafe : : So it's true that / is world writeable in OSX? Ouch. Not world-writable, just group-writable. Still bad. : A chmod or

Re: mutt porting to Max OS-X ?

2001-08-17 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 2001-08-16 13:35:54 -0700, Seraphim Larsen wrote: Anyone know of any attempted ports of Mutt to Max OS-X? Just try - I'd expect it to work. -- Thomas Roesslerhttp://log.does-not-exist.org/

Re: mutt porting to Max OS-X ?

2001-08-17 Thread Aaron Schrab
At 12:42 +0530 17 Aug 2001, Suresh Ramasubramanian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So it's true that / is world writeable in OSX? Ouch. As has already been pointed out it's only group writeable. I don't think there's a sendmail config option to make it ignore world-writeable directories. And as

Re: mutt porting to Max OS-X ?

2001-08-17 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Chris Wong mutt [17/08/01 00:08 -0700]: This might be slightly off topic, but is there any way to make mutt send mail to an SMTP host directly like pine? If not, how do I make sendmail use a particular smtp host? This has been answered quite often. Mutt will always use an external smtp

Re: mutt porting to Max OS-X ?

2001-08-17 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Aaron Schrab mutt [17/08/01 03:05 -0500]: As has already been pointed out it's only group writeable. I don't Bad enough :) Older versions of Mac OS only support HFS, so they won't work with UFS at all. And from what I hear some programs even have trouble running in OS X on UFS. As for

Re: mutt porting to Max OS-X ?

2001-08-17 Thread Seraphim Larsen
On Thu Aug 16 16:25, Eugene Lee wrote: Mutt compiles on Mac OS X without much problems. I'm glad to hear it! If you're talking about a GUI version, Muttzilla might compile with XFree86 installed. If you're talking about a Cocoa or Carbon version, I dunno. No, nothing special, just

Re: mutt porting to Max OS-X ?

2001-08-17 Thread Eugene Lee
On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 10:17:04AM -0700, Seraphim Larsen wrote: : On Thu Aug 16 16:25, Eugene Lee wrote: : : Mutt compiles on Mac OS X without much problems. : : I'm glad to hear it! I've had mutt-1.2.5 compiled with ncurses-5.2 for quite some time now (it's been fine since OS X PB). I

mutt porting to Max OS-X ?

2001-08-16 Thread Seraphim Larsen
Anyone know of any attempted ports of Mutt to Max OS-X? Thanks, -Seraphim

Re: mutt porting to Max OS-X ?

2001-08-16 Thread Eugene Lee
On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 01:35:54PM -0700, Seraphim Larsen wrote: : : Anyone know of any attempted ports of Mutt to Max OS-X? Mutt compiles on Mac OS X without much problems. If you're talking about a GUI version, Muttzilla might compile with XFree86 installed. If you're talking about a Cocoa

Re: mutt porting to Max OS-X ?

2001-08-16 Thread Chris Wong
I compile mutt on Mac OS X myself and there is also a fink package for it. The only problem is sendmail doesn't work out of the box, so I am trying to figure out how set it up on Mac OS X, if anyone of you know how to do that, please shoot me an email. Chris On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 04:25:01PM

Re: mutt porting to Max OS-X ?

2001-08-16 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Chris Wong mutt [16/08/01 19:03 -0700]: I compile mutt on Mac OS X myself and there is also a fink package for it. The only problem is sendmail doesn't work out of the box, so I am trying to figure out how set it up on Mac OS X, if anyone of you know how to do that, please shoot me an email.