Re: procmail vs dovecote (was Re: What are the current fetchmail/getmail and/or procmail/maildrop utilities?)

2012-11-11 Thread Chris Green
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 10:37:04PM +, Tony's unattended mail wrote: However, I find dovecot deliver (which uses the sieve language for filtering) to be much more readable/writable than procmail. Sieve does not include regular expressions -- I shit you not. Dovecote needs regular

procmail vs dovecote (was Re: What are the current fetchmail/getmail and/or procmail/maildrop utilities?)

2012-11-10 Thread Tony's unattended mail
However, I find dovecot deliver (which uses the sieve language for filtering) to be much more readable/writable than procmail. Sieve does not include regular expressions -- I shit you not. Dovecote needs regular expression capability to be shoe-horned in by some hokey plugin. Regular

Re: procmail vs dovecote (was Re: What are the current fetchmail/getmail and/or procmail/maildrop utilities?)

2012-11-10 Thread Jamie Paul Griffin
/ Tony's unattended mail wrote on Sat 10.Nov'12 at 22:37:04 + / However, I find dovecot deliver (which uses the sieve language for filtering) to be much more readable/writable than procmail. Sieve does not include regular expressions -- I shit you not. Dovecote needs regular