Rocco --
...and then Rocco Rutte said...
%
% Hi,
Hello!
%
% * David T-G [2002-06-03 04:44:10 CEST] wrote:
% ...and then Rocco Rutte said...
%
% % I originally meant the '-Q' switch which has the advantage
%
% Oh, neat! Now I suppose I have a reason to dig into 1.5.1
% already :-)
%
Rocco, et al --
...and then Rocco Rutte said...
%
...
%
% Good, so your References: will hopefully re-appear? It seems
% that your mails only have In-Reply-To.
Well, it gets even better... My reply to Sven was full of references,
and then *your* reply to me had only two, and so the Refs have
Hi,
* David T-G [2002-06-03 13:16:43 CEST] wrote:
...and then Rocco Rutte said...
% Good, so your References: will hopefully re-appear? It seems
% that your mails only have In-Reply-To.
Well, it gets even better... My reply to Sven was full of references,
Not over here.
and then *your*
Rocco --
...and then Rocco Rutte said...
%
% Hi,
Hello!
%
% * David T-G [2002-06-03 13:16:43 CEST] wrote:
% ...and then Rocco Rutte said...
%
% % Good, so your References: will hopefully re-appear? It seems
% % that your mails only have In-Reply-To.
%
% Well, it gets even better...
Hi,
* David T-G [2002-06-03 14:01:38 CEST] wrote:
...and then Rocco Rutte said...
% % Good, so your References: will hopefully re-appear? It seems
% % that your mails only have In-Reply-To.
%
% Well, it gets even better... My reply to Sven was full
% of references,
%
% Not over
Rocco, et al --
...and then Rocco Rutte said...
%
% Hi,
Hello!
%
% * David T-G [2002-06-02 04:40:58 CEST] wrote:
...
%
% You mentioned your non-standard config;
% where did you get your mutt itself?
%
% I think I mentioned it before, but the query-feature from
% the unstable branch
Hi,
* David T-G [2002-06-02 19:59:21 CEST] wrote:
...and then Rocco Rutte said...
% I think I mentioned it before, but the query-feature from
% the unstable branch (which didn't seem to make it in 1.4) is
% extremely usefull in such a case (since it dumps the real
% value mutt would use
