On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 08:32:33PM +0100, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 11:23:19AM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
changed my 'reply_regexp' by adding [ \t]* before the color per
Cameron's suggestion, and replied to it. Mutt removed the RE :
and replaced it with Re: , as it
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:01:09AM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
There's no whitespace before the colon in the above pattern, so it
won't match RE :.
Try:
set reply_regexp=^((re([\[^-][0-9]+\]?)*|aw|antwort|antw|wg)[ \t]*:[
\t]*)+
You can see I've added [ \t]* before the colon.
On 2009-11-23, Nicolas KOWALSKI n...@petole.demisel.net wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:01:09AM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
There's no whitespace before the colon in the above pattern, so it
won't match RE :.
Try:
set reply_regexp=^((re([\[^-][0-9]+\]?)*|aw|antwort|antw|wg)[
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 11:23:19AM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
changed my 'reply_regexp' by adding [ \t]* before the color per
Cameron's suggestion, and replied to it. Mutt removed the RE :
and replaced it with Re: , as it should.
So there's something else broken in my config. I will search.
On 21Nov2009 23:20, Nicolas KOWALSKI n...@petole.demisel.net wrote:
| On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 09:14:08PM +0100, Michael Wagner wrote:
| I have this in my muttrc and it works:
|
| set reply_regexp=^((re([\[^-][0-9]+\]?)*|aw|antwort|antw|wg):[ \t]*)+
|
| Thanks for your reply.
| Well, I just
Hello,
Sometimes I receive mail replies with the RE : original subject
string as subject. This RE : is apparently not recognized by the
default reply_regexp value, because when I reply to this kind of mail,
mutt add another Re: in front of the subject line; furthermore, the
threading is
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 07:29:18PM +0100, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
Hello,
Sometimes I receive mail replies with the RE : original subject
string as subject. This RE : is apparently not recognized by the
default reply_regexp value, because when I reply to this kind of mail,
mutt add
* Nicolas KOWALSKI n...@petole.demisel.net 21.11.2009
Sometimes I receive mail replies with the RE : original subject
string as subject. This RE : is apparently not recognized by the
default reply_regexp value, because when I reply to this kind of mail,
mutt add another Re: in front of
Hei hei,
My understanding is that threading has nothing to do with the subject
line. If it did threads couldn't be hijacked. What am I missing?
Maybe the following mail headers: Message-ID, References and In-Reply-To.
Greets
Alex
--
»With the first link, the chain is forged. The first
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 12:48:30PM -0700, RobertHoltzman wrote:
My understanding is that threading has nothing to do with the subject
line. If it did threads couldn't be hijacked. What am I missing?
Check out strict_threads in the muttrc manual.
--
Monte
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 09:14:08PM +0100, Michael Wagner wrote:
* Nicolas KOWALSKI n...@petole.demisel.net 21.11.2009
Sometimes I receive mail replies with the RE : original subject
string as subject. This RE : is apparently not recognized by the
default reply_regexp value, because
11 matches
Mail list logo
