I find something odd about the threading tree. Imagine you have two
messages one under the other in a thread three. In one set of those
the child message is a direct reply to the parent. In the second set
they are both replies to a message that is gone, so they are both tied
together in a
* Ken Weingold [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-30 19:03]:
I find something odd about the threading tree. Imagine you have two
messages one under the other in a thread three. In one set of those
the child message is a direct reply to the parent. In the second set
they are both replies to a
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
* Ken Weingold [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-30 19:03]:
I find something odd about the threading tree. Imagine you have two
messages one under the other in a thread three. In one set of those
the child message is a direct reply to the parent. In the
At 15:03 -0400 30 Aug 2002, Ken Weingold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I find something odd about the threading tree. Imagine you have two
messages one under the other in a thread three. In one set of those
the child message is a direct reply to the parent. In the second set
they are both
At 15:28 -0500 30 Aug 2002, I wrote:
I'm not entirely convinced that I understand what you're saying, but
does setting the hide_missing option help?
That should read unsetting the hide_missing option. The option
is set by default.
--
Aaron Schrab [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002, Aaron Schrab wrote:
At 15:28 -0500 30 Aug 2002, I wrote:
I'm not entirely convinced that I understand what you're saying, but
does setting the hide_missing option help?
That should read unsetting the hide_missing option. The option
is set by default.
No, my
At 16:40 -0400 30 Aug 2002, Ken Weingold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002, Aaron Schrab wrote:
That should read unsetting the hide_missing option. The option
is set by default.
No, my comments have nothing to do with limiting. I'll draw out an
The hide_missing option
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002, Aaron Schrab wrote:
No, my comments have nothing to do with limiting. I'll draw out an
The hide_missing option doesn't have anything to do with limiting
either.
Really? I didn't know what hide_missing was, so I looked in the
manual and this is what it says:
At 17:03 -0400 30 Aug 2002, Ken Weingold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002, Aaron Schrab wrote:
No, my comments have nothing to do with limiting. I'll draw out an
The hide_missing option doesn't have anything to do with limiting
either.
Really? I didn't know what
* Ken Weingold [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-30 17:03 -0400]:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002, Aaron Schrab wrote:
No, my comments have nothing to do with limiting. I'll draw out an
The hide_missing option doesn't have anything to do with limiting
either.
Really? I didn't know what hide_missing
Yes, this is the intended behavior. It's because mutt displays the
subject if the parent is not visible or missing, on the theory that who
knows what the parent's subject is.
-Daniel
On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 11:05:07PM -0800, Will Yardley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
David Ellement wrote:
I
David Ellement wrote:
I also see this. Here's an example from this list.
it also seems to happen when the parent moves out of the top of the
display.
173 rDF Mar 22 To [EMAIL PROTECTED] (1.6K) Fwd: Re: spews collateral damage
174 rDL Mar 22 Dallas Bethune (1.7K) |*
175 DL Mar 23
* Will Yardley [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-19 21:27]:
any idea why the subject is sometimes duplicated in threaded displays?
it seems to happen mainly when the parent is missing; ie:
82 DL Mar 18 Ralf Hildebrandt (1.0K) --Re: SMTP dialog log
83 N L Mar 19 Bernd Matthes (1.0K)
On 020320, at 15:32:27, Sven Guckes wrote
hmm.. can you type up a sample mailbox which shows this?
You might attach this mailbox and then we can
take a look at it with mutt -f filename etc.
I also see this. Here's an example from this list.
--
David Ellement
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu
Sven Guckes wrote:
hmm.. can you type up a sample mailbox which shows this?
You might attach this mailbox and then we can
take a look at it with mutt -f filename etc.
well i'm using Maildir, so that would be a bit difficult. here's a
better example though (from an earlier off list message).
any idea why the subject is sometimes duplicated in threaded displays?
it seems to happen mainly when the parent is missing; ie:
81 L Mar 18 Wietse Venema (1.0K) Re: Getting postalias to use gdbm
82 DL Mar 18 Ralf Hildebrandt (1.0K) --Re: SMTP dialog log
83 N L Mar 19 Bernd
On Mon 06-Aug-2001 at 05:25:52PM -0400, Ethan Blanton wrote:
Justin R. Miller spake unto us the following wisdom:
Which brings me to a question... what does the '' represent in the same
position?
It generally seems to me that it means you have limited your message
list, and there are
Heya
I can't find any information in the mutt manual about the meaning
of the * character, when it appears in the child message
subject lines in the index. Can anyone tell me what it
signifies?
I have threading enabled and ascii_chars set (although this
character appears as a * in either
Jonathan Irving spake unto us the following wisdom:
I can't find any information in the mutt manual about the meaning
of the * character, when it appears in the child message
subject lines in the index. Can anyone tell me what it
signifies?
It indicates that the denoted message is subject
Justin R. Miller spake unto us the following wisdom:
I can't find any information in the mutt manual about the meaning of
the * character, when it appears in the child message subject lines
in the index. Can anyone tell me what it signifies?
I believe it means that the thread was
20 matches
Mail list logo
