On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 04:39:31PM -0400, Ken Weingold wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2002, Will Yardley wrote:
> > perhaps you could explain what functionality is missing in Putty that
> > SecureCRT has? for certain functions, SecureCRT is a lot better, but for
> > many users, Putty is easier to use an
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002, Will Yardley wrote:
> perhaps you could explain what functionality is missing in Putty that
> SecureCRT has? for certain functions, SecureCRT is a lot better, but for
> many users, Putty is easier to use and provides the desired
SecureCRT is just a lot more robust in pretty
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Ken Weingold wrote:
> If you like putty and want a REALLY nice ssh client, check out
> SecureCRT from VanDyke. www.vandyke.com . For Windows I really
> couldn't ask for more, and VanDyke is a perfect example of how a
> company should be run.
I tested it a few months ago (t
Ken Weingold wrote:
> You get what you pay for. Putty sucks ass compared to SecureCRT.
> Putty vs. SecureCRT in functionality is like vi vs. vim, csh vs. tcsh,
> sh vs. bash, etc. Both will do the job, but
well sh and vi are sometimes better for a task than their "improved"
counterparts (l
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> Am 24.04.2002 um 04:34:38 -0400 schrieb Ken Weingold folgendes:
>
> > If you like putty and want a REALLY nice ssh client, check out
> > SecureCRT from VanDyke. www.vandyke.com . For Windows I really
> > couldn't ask for more, and VanDyke is a per
Am 24.04.2002 um 04:34:38 -0400 schrieb Ken Weingold folgendes:
> If you like putty and want a REALLY nice ssh client, check out
> SecureCRT from VanDyke. www.vandyke.com . For Windows I really
> couldn't ask for more, and VanDyke is a perfect example of how a
> company should be run.
What abo
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002, Alain Bench wrote:
> Hello Sven,
>
> On Sunday, April 21, 2002 at 5:37:05 AM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
>
> > telnet.exe sucks. use putty.exe. nuff said.
>
> Thanks for the advice, Sven! It solved a half of my problem: I now
> get nice charset and nice thread tree. You
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, David T-G wrote:
> I wanted to ask about this before but forgot... Are you sure it's
> cygwin's and not Win's? Where is telnet if you do a "which"?
cygwin dll implements a terminal emulator inside M$'s console window.
(running bash in the window makes the terminal emulator
Alain --
...and then Alain Bench said...
%
% Hello Sven,
%
% On Sunday, April 21, 2002 at 5:37:05 AM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
%
% > telnet.exe sucks. use putty.exe. nuff said.
%
% Thanks for the advice, Sven! It solved a half of my problem: I now
That's good to hear!
% get nice chars
Hello Sven,
On Sunday, April 21, 2002 at 5:37:05 AM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
> telnet.exe sucks. use putty.exe. nuff said.
Thanks for the advice, Sven! It solved a half of my problem: I now
get nice charset and nice thread tree. You're right, Putty seems to be
5 steps ahead compared to Cy
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 09:45:29PM -0600, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
> Alas! Sven Guckes spake thus:
> > telnet.exe sucks. use putty.exe. nuff said.
>
> I disagree. /usr/bin/ssh beats both of them ;)
ssh (usually) doesn't do terminal emulation.
--
Thomas E. Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://in
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 05:37:05AM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
> * Alain Bench <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-14 21:57]:
> > I use mutt in 3 ways:
> > ...
> > - running remotely on a Linux box, Mutt started from Cygwin thru it's
> > own /bin/telnet.exe (again in a Bash session inside a cmd.exe window
--mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Alas! Sven Guckes spake thus:
> telnet.exe sucks. use putty.exe. nuff said.
I disagree. /usr/bin/ssh beats both of them ;)
--=20
Rob 'Feztaa' Park
[EMAIL PROT
* Alain Bench <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-14 21:57]:
> I use mutt in 3 ways:
> ...
> - running remotely on a Linux box, Mutt started from Cygwin thru it's
> own /bin/telnet.exe (again in a Bash session inside a cmd.exe window).
> Same thing: Nice charset, bad trees. Note I had to copy Cygwin's
>
Hello Luke,
On Friday, April 12, 2002 at 3:39:03 PM +0100, Luke Ross wrote:
[graphic versus ascii thread tree]
> If under cygwin, force mutt to run under code page 437
Could you please elaborate this one? I was never able to get Latin-1
characters *and* graphic tree at the same time un
Alas! Katie Bechtold spake thus:
> Just
> goes to show, no matter how long I look for an answer, I'm bound to
> find it the minute after sending my query to a mailing list. :)
You too??!
Lol, I do that all the time ;)
> Apologies to all.
Don't sweat it.
--
Rob 'Feztaa' Park
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 10:27:02AM -0400, Katie Bechtold wrote:
> I'm using Mutt 1.3.28i, and my thread tree display looks messed up:
>
> 1117 L Jan 16 Nick Wilson (0.6K) Hook?
> 1118 sL Jan 16 René Clerc (1.3K) mq>
> 1119 L Jan 16 Nicolas Rachinsky(0.3K) tq>
>
Doh! The solution was to set ascii_chars=yes. That was it. Just
goes to show, no matter how long I look for an answer, I'm bound to
find it the minute after sending my query to a mailing list. :)
Apologies to all.
--
Katie Bechtold
http://www.katie-and-rob.org/katie/
msg27096/pgp0.pgp
I'm using Mutt 1.3.28i, and my thread tree display looks messed up:
1117 L Jan 16 Nick Wilson (0.6K) Hook?
1118 sL Jan 16 René Clerc (1.3K) mq>
1119 L Jan 16 Nicolas Rachinsky(0.3K) tq>
1120 L Jan 16 Philip Wittamore (0.5K) x tq>
1121 sL Jan 16 Benjamin Smit
19 matches
Mail list logo
