On 020328, at 00:15:42, Sven Guckes wrote
> * Jeremy Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-27 23:05]:
> > On Mar 27, Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > > There is no way to remove a message-hook, is there?
> > unhook message-hook
> > This removes all message-hooks currently
> > defined, but
* Jeremy Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-28 01:17]:
> > i find it bad by design that "message-hook" does
> > not have an matching "unmessage-hook" command.
> There's really no difference between 'unmessage-hook',
> 'unsend-hook
t itches you.
>
> so much for theory.
?
> well, i find it bad by design that "message-hook" does not have an
> matching "unmessage-hook" command.
There's really no difference between 'unmessage-hook', 'unsend-hook',
'unfoo-hook'
that "message-hook"
does not have an matching "unmessage-hook" command.
this should be taken care of before mutt-1.4 ships.
then again, obviously not many people are using it.
maybe I should post a few examples
to mutt-users and comp.mail.mutt? ;-)
Sven
--
message-hook pi
On Mar 28, Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> * Jeremy Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-27 23:05]:
> > On Mar 27, Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > > There is no way to remove a message-hook, is there? So once you
> > unhook message-hook
> > This removes all message-hooks curre
* Jeremy Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-27 23:05]:
> On Mar 27, Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > There is no way to remove a message-hook, is there?
> > So once you screw up with the pattern or whatever then
> > you have to correct your setup and restart mutt, right?
> unhook mess
On Mar 27, Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> There is no way to remove a message-hook, is there?
> So once you screw up with the pattern or whatever then
> you have to correct your setup and restart mutt, right?
unhook message-hook
This removes all message-hooks currently defined, but it
