On 020328, at 00:15:42, Sven Guckes wrote
> * Jeremy Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-27 23:05]:
> > On Mar 27, Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > > There is no way to remove a message-hook, is there?
> > unhook message-hook
> > This removes all message-hooks currently
> > defined, but
* Jeremy Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-28 01:17]:
> > i find it bad by design that "message-hook" does
> > not have an matching "unmessage-hook" command.
> There's really no difference between 'unmessage-hook',
> 'unsend-hook', 'unfoo-hook', etc. vs. 'unhook message-hook', etc.
> It could b
On Mar 28, Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> * Jeremy Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-27 23:49]:
> > > Sven [adding one more item for the pet peeves list]
> > The un* functions are pretty clean; I doubt it would be very hard to
> > scratch this one if it itches you.
>
> so much for t
* Jeremy Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-27 23:49]:
> > Sven [adding one more item for the pet peeves list]
> The un* functions are pretty clean; I doubt it would
> be very hard to scratch this one if it itches you.
so much for theory.
well, i find it bad by design that "message-hook"
does
On Mar 28, Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> * Jeremy Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-27 23:05]:
> > On Mar 27, Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > > There is no way to remove a message-hook, is there? So once you
> > unhook message-hook
> > This removes all message-hooks curre
* Jeremy Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-27 23:05]:
> On Mar 27, Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > There is no way to remove a message-hook, is there?
> > So once you screw up with the pattern or whatever then
> > you have to correct your setup and restart mutt, right?
> unhook mess
