I know that I can set line wrapping at a particular line length or a value
less that the display line length, but both of these disreguard quote
indicators and make viewing/reading quotes very sloppy. Is there a method
to intelligently wrap quoted material?
tks,
--
(paka)Patrick Shanahan
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 17:52, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
I know that I can set line wrapping at a particular line length or a value
less that the display line length, but both of these disreguard quote
indicators and make viewing/reading quotes very sloppy. Is there a method to
* Michael Graham mich...@skky.org [12-12-11 14:28]:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 17:52, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
I know that I can set line wrapping at a particular line length or a
value less that the display line length, but both of these disreguard
quote indicators and make viewing/reading
Mr. Wade [mutt-users] 29/05/01 23:32 -0400:
I use vim also. Mine will do the word wrap, as you describe, but
the adding of new quote marks... how do you accomplish that?
If there's a single quotemark at the start of a long line and you wrap it, the
entire paragraph is wrapped
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Mr. Wade [mutt-users] 29/05/01 23:32 -0400:
I use vim also. Mine will do the word wrap, as you describe, but
the adding of new quote marks... how do you accomplish that?
If there's a single quotemark at the start of a long line and
you wrap
Larry Hignight ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said something to this effect on 05/18/2001:
I'm not sure how I missed this in the Mutt manual and some online tutorials,
but I have some people on another mail list complaining that my email isn't
wrapping properly. I am using vim as my editor. Which needs
My .vimrc has just this line for this problem:
set textwidth=72
On 05/21/01, 08:04:36AM -0400, darren chamberlain wrote:
Larry Hignight ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said something to this effect on 05/18/2001:
I'm not sure how I missed this in the Mutt manual and some online tutorials,
but I have
John P. Verel [mutt-users] Mon, May 21, 2001 at 04:22:09PM -0400:
My .vimrc has just this line for this problem:
set textwidth=72
I use
set editor=/usr/bin/vim +':set textwidth=77' +':set wrap' +\`awk'/^$/ {print i+2;
exit} {i++}' %s\` %s
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian + Wallopus Malletus
As a variation on the vim invocation, I use this:
set editor =vim +/^$
This puts me at the first blank line of the composition screen.
John
On 05/22/01, 07:23:43AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
I use
set editor=/usr/bin/vim +':set textwidth=77' +':set wrap' +\`awk'/^$/ {print i+2;
On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 05:41:13PM -0400, Mr. Wade wrote:
Larry Hignight wrote:
I'm not sure how I missed this in the Mutt manual and some online
tutorials, but I have some people on another mail list complaining
that my email isn't wrapping properly. I am using vim as my
editor. Which
I'm not sure how I missed this in the Mutt manual and some online tutorials,
but I have some people on another mail list complaining that my email isn't
wrapping properly. I am using vim as my editor. Which needs to be configured
to setup wrapping at 72? Is it in one of the vim files or the
Larry Hignight wrote:
I'm not sure how I missed this in the Mutt manual and some online tutorials,
but I have some people on another mail list complaining that my email isn't
wrapping properly. I am using vim as my editor. Which needs to be configured
to setup wrapping at 72? Is it in one
Dirk Laurie wrote:
The problem is this: by the time vim gets control, the quote sign ""
has already been prepended to the line. I want the line-break algorithm
to do its thing before the "" sign gets prepended.
There's an example of commands to put in your vimrc file that will
automatically
Dirk Laurie wrote:
signs to show that a line break was made by the viewer. However, when
printing or quoting (in a reply) these convenient line breaks are
gone, and the result looks terrible. Can I persuade mutt to use the
viewer-formatted version instead of the original when printing or
Jrgen Salk wrote:
Yes, I have intentionally used overlength lines, such
that you can check it out. Have fun.
Ahem, this bloody damned web interface, I'm using right
now, seems to have it's own idea of breaking lines. :-)
Regards - Juergen.
--
Sent through GMX FreeMail -
how do you do this
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 08:02:11AM +0100, Suresh Ramasubramanian muttered:
| *[Dirk Laurie on Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 08:52:14AM +0200]:
|
| signs to show that a line break was made by the viewer. However, when
| printing or quoting (in a reply) these convenient line
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Dirk Laurie wrote:
Jrgen Salk skryf:
Dirk Laurie wrote:
signs to show that a line break was made by the viewer. However, when
printing or quoting (in a reply) these convenient line breaks are
gone, and the result looks terrible. Can I persuade mutt to use the
Dirk Laurie wrote:
The problem is this: by the time vim gets control, the quote sign ""
has already been prepended to the line. I want the line-break algorithm
to do its thing before the "" sign gets prepended.
I understand quite exactly what you want.
Just try this "gqG" thing with vim
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 08:52:14AM +0200, Dirk Laurie wrote:
Some of my correspondents use a mail composition system that does not
break long lines into screen-width lines. I dare not complain for they
will then send me HTML or Word versions. The mutt viewer handles the
long lines nicely,
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001, Jrgen Salk wrote:
If you edit your mails with vim, you can easily reformat the quoted
lines by the "gq{motion}" command. E.g. "gqj" will format the
current line and places the cursor in the next line. Then proceed
with the "." command. Or just type "gqG" which will
On 2001.02.28, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
"Dirk Laurie" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is this: by the time vim gets control, the quote sign ""
has already been prepended to the line. I want the line-break algorithm
to do its thing before the "" sign gets prepended.
The problem
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 10:49:03AM -0600, David Champion wrote:
On 2001.02.28, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
"Dirk Laurie" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is this: by the time vim gets control, the quote sign ""
has already been prepended to the line.
Try using "par q" to
Try this:
set editor="vim -c 'set tw=72 comments=nb:'"
-Justin
Thus spake Dirk Laurie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
J?rgen Salk skryf:
Dirk Laurie wrote:
signs to show that a line break was made by the viewer. However, when
printing or quoting (in a reply) these convenient line
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 09:57:33AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jed is a very good editor that has a mail_mode that does smart
formatting of quoted paragraphs. No more "" characters in the
middle of lines.
I've always been a big fan of GNUEmacs, and text mode has "" quoting
reformatting
Some of my correspondents use a mail composition system that does not
break long lines into screen-width lines. I dare not complain for they
will then send me HTML or Word versions. The mutt viewer handles the
long lines nicely, breaking at word boundaries and putting in cyan plus
signs to
*[Dirk Laurie on Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 08:52:14AM +0200]:
signs to show that a line break was made by the viewer. However, when
printing or quoting (in a reply) these convenient line breaks are
gone, and the result looks terrible. Can I persuade mutt to use the
viewer-formatted version
J McKitrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Sat, 11 Mar 2000:
started using xterm with a smaller font, so more words fit per line. I
got complaints about my word wrap.
I'm not surprised, with the line length in your emails.
I have word
wrap margin set to 10 in vi, but that isn't helping, i
Well, here on my shell account i use the original vi. On my machine i use vim.
So, which margin settings can i use?
--
-jm
On Sat, Mar 11, 2000 at 02:04:56PM +, J McKitrick wrote:
Well, here on my shell account i use the original vi. On my machine i use vim.
So, which margin settings can i use?
--
-jm
I use vim and I have to following in my .vimrc
:set tw=70CR
:map F10 gqap
This will cause vim to insert
* Matt Hortman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [000311 11:30]:
:set tw=70CR
:map F10 gqap
This will cause vim to insert a newline (as you type) between words so
that the line is not longer than 70 characters. This only applies,
however, when the cursor is at the end of the line. IOW, if you stop
i realize this is a bit off subject because it is somewhat of an editor problem, but
it applies to mutt as well. I
started using xterm with a smaller font, so more words fit per line. I got complaints
about my word wrap. I have word
wrap margin set to 10 in vi, but that isn't helping, i
* J McKitrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000311 18:00]:
On my machine i use vim.
I have this line in my .vimrc, which sets textwidth only for mail
editing in mutt:
au BufNewFile,BufRead /tmp/mutt* set tw=70
--
christian molls
student of laws
univ of cologne
On Sat, Mar 11, 2000 at 12:30:28PM -0600, Ben Beuchler thus spoke:
On Sat, Mar 11, 2000 at 04:50:02AM +, j mckitrick wrote:
In vi:
:set textwidth=74
:set wrapmargin=75
--
Fairlight- |||[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Fairlight Consulting
__/\__ ||| "I'm talking for
about my word wrap. I have word
wrap margin set to 10 in vi, but that isn't helping, i guess. Is there a better way?
--
-jm
--
"There is no spoon"
-- The Matrix
On Sat, Mar 11, 2000 at 04:50:02AM +, j mckitrick wrote:
i realize this is a bit off subject because it is somewhat of an
editor problem, but it applies to mutt as well. I started using xterm
with a smaller font, so more words fit per line. I got complaints
about my word wrap. I have
Subject: word wrap
i realize this is a bit off subject because it is somewhat of an editor problem, but
it applies to mutt as well. I
started using xterm with a smaller font, so more words fit per line. I got complaints
about my word wrap. I have word
wrap margin set to 10 in vi
36 matches
Mail list logo
