Re: yymmdd is *informal*, dammit!

2002-03-14 Thread Sven Guckes
* Dave Pearson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-14 12:17]: * Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-14 12:09]: * Dave Pearson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-14 09:27]: , | ELISP (parse-time-string 020313 14:17) | (0 17 14 nil nil nil nil nil nil) ` looks like the parsing can still

Re: yymmdd is *informal*, dammit!

2002-03-14 Thread Dave Pearson
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-14 13:52:07 +0100]: * Dave Pearson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-14 12:17]: How should it infer the year format, get the seconds and work out the timezone from the above data? Even if the seconds is considered lossy the other two items of data seem

Re: yymmdd is *informal*, dammit!

2002-03-14 Thread Andre Majorel
On 2002-03-14 13:52 +0100, Sven Guckes wrote: I am using the format yymmdd on my *webpages* - and for dates only. apart from that I was using it in the attribution - with hh:mm. but if applied to messages - which century can this be? 1900? 2100? Think, man, THINK! no - try HARDER! ;-)