On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 12:37:09AM +0100, Axel Bichler wrote:
Hi Dave!
that's more constructive than a self-confessed "uppish tone". It would
seem you've decided to do that so I don't really see a problem or a need
for such a tone.
On the other hand, meticulously insisting on an "It
Basically just a very basic question:
mutt can use Maildir type folders. But how can I tell procmail to sort my
Mail into Maildir type folders instead of Mbox type folders?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
System Engineerinnominate AG
Diplom-Informatiker
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 11:38:25AM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
Basically just a very basic question:
mutt can use Maildir type folders. But how can I tell procmail to sort my
Mail into Maildir type folders instead of Mbox type folders?
There is a patch for procmail to deliver into a
Ralf Hildebrandt writes:
Basically just a very basic question:
You'll get a very basic answer, too :)
mutt can use Maildir type folders. But how can I tell procmail to sort my
Mail into Maildir type folders instead of Mbox type folders?
man procmailrc.
And you definitely want procmail
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 10:49:56AM +, Pedro Melo wrote:
There is a patch for procmail to deliver into a maildir. See http://www.qmail.org/
Might be. But Procmail-3.15.1 can do this without a patch.
Isn't it great if an author accepts patches to his program...
Another solution is to use
Might be. But Procmail-3.15.1 can do this without a patch.
Isn't it great if an author accepts patches to his program...
The procmail author hasn't been involved with the software in years!
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 12:04:35PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
:0 W: bounce.lock
* ^From.*postmaster@
$MAILDIR/bounces
looks for MAILDIR delivery instead of MBOX delivery.
It's really as easy as postpending a "/" to the mailbox name:
:0 W: bounce.lock
* ^From.*postmaster@
first for the important part:
while reading the source to find a place to put Brandon Long's "folder
count" patch. i've found a configure switch named "--enable-buffy-size"
that seems to solve the detection issue. i only browsed through the
source since it was quite late, but it seems to
My mbox - maildir migration worked. As an (expected) side effect, NFS isn't
causing problems anymore and detection of new mail works reliable.
Life is sweet.
Except for one thing:
12 010120 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (120) RE: [TDSC3D395D04] InterScan v3.5 for Solaris
Problem
13 010121
* Wilhelm Wienemann [EMAIL PROTECTED] [19/01/01, 18:42:55]:
Why didn't read you the answers to the same question from
--- cut here -
From: Jens Paulus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: German umlauts and alternates in Mutt.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 01:34:03PM +0100, Heinrich Langos wrote:
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 08:07:58PM +, Dave Pearson wrote:
It would appear that we have different definitions of "accessed" and
"modified". My copy of mutt shows me when an mbox has been modified, not
when it has been
Im using mutt for my mail agent, and am having problems with it since the
1.25 - 1.3 update. I am using it to view mail over IMAP, and in 1.2 versions
the mail that was in my INBOX, and was read was then moved to my mbox folder,
but with version 1.3 that doesn't happen anymore... could you
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 01:50:24PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
the 5th column always indicated the number of lines in a mail. As you see,
with my old mail in MAILDIR format, it works, but with newly arrived mail
(the last two=, I always get a "( 0)" for the number of lines.
Ok. Ok. It's
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 01:10:46PM +, Dave Pearson wrote:
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 01:34:03PM +0100, Heinrich Langos wrote:
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 08:07:58PM +, Dave Pearson wrote:
[...]
it's not only me who wants mutt to behave that way, i guess. if it was not
the intention to
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 04:16:25PM +0100, Heinrich Langos wrote:
Dave, you may stop reading. The rest will only bother you and further
waste your time.
With an attitude like that it's not surprising that you're confused about
what I've been saying. Read what I've actually said, look for the
Daniel --
...and then Daniel Freedman said...
%
% My mutt is now at 1.0.1i, and I'll try to convince the sysadmin to
% upgrade to 1.25. Could this version difference affect my not seeing
Well, you could always grab the source and build it yourself; the only
special program is mutt_dotlock,
On Friday, 19 January 2001 at 13:05, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 07:07:19PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Nils Vogels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Brian J. Murrell !
Hi Nils,
I am not 100% sure, but wouldn't the sync-mailbox (by default
17 matches
Mail list logo
