On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 08:25:07PM +0200, Wilhelm Wienemann wrote:
I am searching for a way defining a default TO: address depending on
list-reply (default: L)
Reply to the current or tagged message(s) by extracting any addresses
which match the addresses given by the ``lists or
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 07:40:12AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Using a large mallet, Horace G. Friend III whacked out:
I wrote:
Outblaze is a third party email outsourcer.
By third party email outsourcer, do you mean it acts as a relay for
selected clients such as
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Using a large mallet, Mr. Wade whacked out:
folder-hook .'unmy_hdr To:'
folder-hook =IN-L-mutt-users 'my_hdr To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
A problem with this, though, is that list-replies tend to have
the list address twice in the To:
Hello Osamu!
On Sat, 12 May 2001, Osamu Aoki wrote:
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 08:25:07PM +0200, Wilhelm Wienemann wrote:
I am searching for a way defining a default TO: address depending
on
list-reply (default: L)
Reply to the current or tagged message(s) by extracting any
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 10:24:24AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Using a large mallet, Duke Normandin whacked out:
You are correct as per the SMTP protocol and the relevant RFCs.
However it's my understanding from a very recent thread on the
FreeBSD-questions list, that the SMTP
Using a large mallet, Duke Normandin whacked out:
I take that by mismatches you mean an almost correct match on the RDNS.
In this day-and-age, 'almost' _is not_ good enough. The suckers _had_
better resolve. The implications of this whole thread for some Mutt users
Heck no. Have you ever
Using a large mallet, Mr. Wade whacked out:
This was an attempt to have Mutt use a default To: address for
a mailbox folder, as I understand it.
Yes. And I use procmail with other headers (say Sender: - usually distinctive
to the list) to filter each list into a separate mbox
--
Suresh
Hi, I know you quoted manual... But context made me worry. I am not
sure we are talking same thing but try explaining what I meant:
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 08:13:28PM +0200, Wilhelm Wienemann wrote:
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 08:25:07PM +0200, Wilhelm Wienemann wrote:
I am searching for a
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Using a large mallet, Mr. Wade whacked out:
This was an attempt to have Mutt use a default To: address for
a mailbox folder, as I understand it.
Yes. And I use procmail with other headers (say Sender: - usually distinctive
to the list) to filter each
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Using a large mallet, Mr. Wade whacked out:
I do this as well. I think that perhaps I misunderstood the
original question. I was under the impression that the asker
wanted to know how to have a default To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
header specified when he
Using a large mallet, Mr. Wade whacked out:
I agree,... but what about messages which are NOT replies? I
think that's what the original question was about. If he invokes
the mail function, (bound to m by default), he must then
specify a To: header address. I think that's what he was
11 matches
Mail list logo
