I have been using Pine for the last 6-8 years, and have come to
be used to the way Pine works.
However, over the last few months, I have heard more and more
good things about mutt, and have decided to switch over.
In this switchover process, there is still some things that
I was used to in
Rune Mossige mutt [23/08/01 09:10 +0200]:
1) How do I set up mutt to cycle all the mailfolders where I
have procmail store new messages inside? Pine had an
'incoming-folders' setting, where I set the folder names,
and the order to look in them. How do I do that in mutt?
mailboxes
Rune Mossige mutt [23/08/01 09:10 +0200]:
I have been using Pine for the last 6-8 years, and have come to
be used to the way Pine works.
I think Sven Guckes and Robin Socha have quite good howtos at
http://www.socha.net re pine - mutt conversion.
-suresh
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Rune Mossige wrote:
1) How do I set up mutt to cycle all the mailfolders where I
have procmail store new messages inside? Pine had an
man muttrc, then look at mailboxes. I use :
mailboxes `echo $HOME/Mail/Mailinglists/*`
All of the mailing list stuff goes into
On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 09:10:41AM +0200, Rune Mossige wrote:
1) How do I set up mutt to cycle all the mailfolders where I
have procmail store new messages inside? Pine had an
'incoming-folders' setting, where I set the folder names,
and the order to look in them. How do I do that
On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 09:10:41AM +0200, Rune Mossige wrote:
I have been using Pine for the last 6-8 years, and have come to
be used to the way Pine works.
However, over the last few months, I have heard more and more
good things about mutt, and have decided to switch over.
Have you
On 2001-08-22 17:01:40 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Also the load when opening the Maildir is WAY higher compared to
the mbox file. Load when opening the mbox is about 2, Maildir is
about 6. Okay, I've got setiathome running, so one may substract 1
(? right?).
Ouch. PLEASE make sure that
On 23.08.2001 10:45:25 Thomas Roessler wrote:
Ouch. PLEASE make sure that (1) swapping isn't necessary, (2) your
CPU is mostly idle when you do measurements, (3) mutt (or, for that
matter, evolution) is the only process which competes for disk
access.
Yes, I do know this. But, the system
On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 06:11:38PM -0700, dannyman wrote:
So, what is the point of abook? To query non-mutt address books from
mutt? It looks like if I was silly enough to want to manage my .aliases
file with it, I would have to convert .aliases to abook format, then run
abook, then
Hello!
After a little bit of thinking and coding I came up with this perl script
to solve the problems I raised on mailbox access times, and some other
more.
I've been using this thing from a couple of days and it seems to get the
job done, but I'd like some peer review.
The script addresses
I'm using procmail to make sure list mail goes into the appropriate
folder like this:
:0:
* ^Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
lists/mutt-users
Then in my .muttrc I want to know which folders received mail, so I do
this:
## mailboxes defines the list of folders to be checked for new mail
## Mutt both
On Thursday, 23 August 2001 at 18:24, Ailbhe Leamy wrote:
On (22/08/01 19:03), Justin R. Miller wrote:
Thus spake Ailbhe Leamy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Is this a wetware error, or a Real Bug?
If you're using 1.3.18 as your mail headers say, then I'd recommend
you try 1.3.20 or 1.3.21,
On (16/08/01 16:55), Eric Cheney wrote:
Hello. I'm kind of new to mutt after coming from years of using pine.
I like mutt very much but one thing I can't find documentation for
(probably my bad) is how to create a personal mailing list. I have
mailing lists that reside on a machine other
On (18/08/01 18:57), David Röhr wrote:
When I answer a mail mutt always put as quote on the last mail
according to the indent_string in my .muttrc.
I want only when no other has replyed, but if there already is a
then i want it to become just
How do I fix this?
I don't know, but
Ailbhe Leamy mutt [23/08/01 18:24 +0100]:
# apt-get install mutt
Reading Package Lists... Done
cd /usr/ports/mail/mutt-devel
make install clean
Less than ten minutes on my (extremely thin) pipe to the 'net
hth
--suresh
[yes, you have to switch to freebsd, but that's a minor detail g]
Brendan Cully [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Version: 1.3.20-1
Replaces: mutt-i
Provides: mail-reader
Depends: libc6 (= 2.2.3-7), libncurses5 (= 5.2.20010310-1),
^^
libsasl7, exim | mail-transport-agent
Recommends: mime-support
Suggests: i18ndata, urlview, ispell,
On (23/08/01 23:38), Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Ailbhe Leamy mutt [23/08/01 18:24 +0100]:
# apt-get install mutt Reading Package Lists... Done
cd /usr/ports/mail/mutt-devel make install clean
[yes, you have to switch to freebsd, but that's a minor detail g]
I'm way too lazy to look
So sprach »Thomas Roessler« am 2001-08-23 um 10:45:25 +0200 :
On 2001-08-22 17:01:40 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
[ mutt 1.3.19i ]
MUCH longer, to be exact, it took about 2 minutes 30 seconds.
Try a newer version. Someone has contributed a patch which improves
mutt's threading algorithm
About two days ago procmail just stopped working.
Here is the error I see in /var/log/mail:
sendmail[5115]: RAA05114: forward /home/jlh/.forward: World writable
directory
I have read the sendmail book on .forward and permissions.
Here are the permissions of the various involved files (jlh is
here's a version of neil townsend's xterm patch that should work with
more recent versions. i was able to do patch -p1 patch in the
mutt-1.3.21 directory.
the only things that are really different are the line numbers.
-w
diff -u mutt-1.3.20/curs_main.c mutt-1.3.20-ro/curs_main.c
---
On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 06:44:44PM -0400, Joel Hammer wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 06:21:57PM -0400, Joel Hammer wrote:
About two days ago procmail just stopped working.
Here is the error I see in /var/log/mail:
sendmail[5115]: RAA05114: forward /home/jlh/.forward: World writable
On Sat, Aug 18, 2001 at 08:26:56PM +0200, Azzazel wrote:
Hi,
Does anybody use procmail for sorting incoming mail?
proc won't sort messages (I've tired test explained on faq page).
Or, maybe I shell use fetchmail for receiving messagess?
I rediscovered one reason why procmail won't sort.
hello,
On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 11:44:10PM, Benjamin Michotte wrote:
is it a problem with my system ? if yes, what's the problem ?
yes... I found the problem...
it was my locale which are broken/older/what_you_want...
... so mutt 1.3.21 rules ;)
---end quoted text---
cu,
binny
--
cat:
23 matches
Mail list logo