Dear Mutt developpers,
I am using Mutt 1.4.2.2i (2006-07-14) on RedHat 5 to automatically read
and parse incoming emails.
I have troubles while reading emails containing tag format=flowed. In
such a case, long lines are wrapped after the 77th character.
If I remove format=flowed from the
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 01:17:39PM +0200, Gilles Mazet-Roux wrote:
I am using Mutt 1.4.2.2i (2006-07-14) on RedHat 5 to automatically
read and parse incoming emails.
I have troubles while reading emails containing tag format=flowed.
In such a case, long lines are wrapped after the 77th
Thanks. Actually I don't want mutt to wrap the long lines and I don't
find how to tell mutt not do wrap long lines when format=flowed.
Gilles
Le 29/09/2010 16:16, Michael Elkins a écrit :
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 01:17:39PM +0200, Gilles Mazet-Roux wrote:
I am using Mutt 1.4.2.2i
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 04:39:56PM +0200, Gilles Mazet-Roux wrote:
Thanks. Actually I don't want mutt to wrap the long lines and I
don't find how to tell mutt not do wrap long lines when
format=flowed.
I think I see what you mean now. If I make my terminal very wide, the text is
still
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 09:19:55AM -0700, Michael Elkins wrote:
I think I see what you mean now. If I make my terminal very wide,
the text is still wrapped at 72 chars. Looking at the code, I do see
it hardcoded. There seems to be an error with the handling of the
$wrap variable. It looks
On Sep 27, 2010 at 11:59 AM +0200, Jostein Berntsen wrote:
If you install the mu search utility, you can open mails directly with
the mu view file path command. To find the file path for a specific
mail you can use mu find search criteria --fields l, d, f, s to
get this displayed on stdout.
Hey,
is there a way to bind the ^G action to ESC?
This would make my vim-like key binding setup complete.
For testing purposes I had tried this:
macro index ESC '\cg'
and under '?' it apear as follows:
ESC macro \cg
But it don't seem to work.
Is there generally a way to bind this
* Michael Elkins on Wednesday, September 29, 2010 at 10:27:41 -0700
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 09:19:55AM -0700, Michael Elkins wrote:
I think I see what you mean now. If I make my terminal very
wide, the text is still wrapped at 72 chars. Looking at the
code, I do see it hardcoded. There
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:36:43PM +0200, Christian Ebert wrote:
http://marc.info/?l=mutt-devm=120065771601523w=2
;-)
Indeed! http://marc.info/?l=mutt-devm=128579588200424w=2
me
* Michael Elkins on Wednesday, September 29, 2010 at 14:49:41 -0700
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:36:43PM +0200, Christian Ebert wrote:
http://marc.info/?l=mutt-devm=120065771601523w=2
;-)
Indeed! http://marc.info/?l=mutt-devm=128579588200424w=2
Best of both worlds, eh? Thank you. I've got
10 matches
Mail list logo