On Thu, Jan 21, 1999 at 04:22:10AM -0600, Brian Bray wrote:
whats wrong with this i got it and modified it from one of the mutt pages
save-hook mutt-users@ +mutt-users-save
Hm, the manual says that the pattern is used against the From: address,
which usually is not [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
David Thorburn-Gundlach [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Since you can, IIUC, encrypt mail with different public keys so that
each private key can, alone, open the message, it makes sense that
pgp would also let your private key open the file.
...and then Jeremy Blosser said...
% It isn't quite
On 1999-01-21 16:09:54 -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
Doesn't the new character-set-handling code in 0.95 make this sort
of thing obsolete? Or rather, isn't that what it's supposed to be
for?
ACK. While recode gives the user some benefits over the stable
character set code, the unstable one
Daniel González Gasull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But *remember*: AFAIK, everybody is NOT able to read text/enriched or
text/html messages. Do not send it by default. Be sure that your
recipient is able to read such messages.
Wouldn't it be neat if you could send a multipart/alternative
