> > > It was found that sendmail's -f option will allow you to forge the
> > > envelope line. Adding myself as a (Thypnotik) trusted user to sendmail's
> > > configuration file ceased the X-Authentication warnings.
> >
> > Warning: you might as well be sending mail as "root" then, since you'r
I just uninstalled my mutt rpm it was 0.8something and have installed the
new international version with PGP support.
The problem is that while it will read my .muttrc and will complain about
problems with it, it WONT use the color scheme I told it to. I'm using
an rxvt and on the terminal, and
Just a note:
If you didn't have formail -D in your .procmailrc file
To clear the dups try:
ls -l mutt-l
formail -q- -D 8192 id-cache mutt-fixed
mv mutt-fixed mutt-l
# make sure to set the owners right
cho
On Wed, Feb 03, 1999 at 07:07:54PM -0800, Joe Rhett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Kudos to the 8 or so people that mailed back telling me how to do it.
> > It was found that sendmail's -f option will allow you to forge the
> > envelope line. Adding myself as a (Thypnotik) trusted user to sen
> Kudos to the 8 or so people that mailed back telling me how to do it.
> It was found that sendmail's -f option will allow you to forge the
> envelope line. Adding myself as a (Thypnotik) trusted user to sendmail's
> configuration file ceased the X-Authentication warnings.
Warning: you might
Vikas Agnihotri ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) skrev:
> On Wed, Feb 03, 1999 at 07:54:37PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Vikas Agnihotri ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) skrev:
>
> > > Ack. I didnt realize it since I de-dupe all my incoming mails using
> > > 'formail -D'. But I just went to my =dupes folder and
On Wed, Feb 03, 1999 at 10:52:38AM -0500, Stan Ryckman wrote:
> Jim Graham wrote:
> >incoming via UUCP --> sendmail --> procmail --> disk
> >
> > At some point between the message being received via UUCP and procmail
> > actually starting to work with it, the original envelope "From " is
> >
I know this has come up before. I actually want the headers for the
recipients from one mail, but I actually want to forward the contents of
another mail. Is that possible?
Thanks,
-Clint
Vikas Agnihotri ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) skrev:
> Ack. I didnt realize it since I de-dupe all my incoming mails using
> 'formail -D'. But I just went to my =dupes folder and sure enough,
> there were a ton of mutt-users mails.
Interesting. Just how do you do this...is it a procmail recipe and if so
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=yEPQxsgoJgBvi8ip; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
On Wed, Feb 03, 1999 at 01:27:06PM +, Lars Hecking wrote:
>
> Is it just me, or has anyone else received all mails from
> mutt-users twice since yesterday? As this only happens with
> mutt-users, I don't think it's a lcoal problem.
Me2
--
Moritz Moeller-Herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN 3585
On Wed, Feb 03, 1999 at 09:01:26AM -0800, Claus Assmann wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 03, 1999, Lars Hecking wrote:
> > Is it just me, or has anyone else received all mails from
> > mutt-users twice since yesterday? As this only happens with
> > mutt-users, I don't think it's a lcoal problem.
> The pro
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Jim Graham wrote:
> And in some cases, it doesn't. At home, every e-mail that comes in
> >from outside addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (i.e., it doesn't
> matter whether it's addressed to me, root, etc.) starts with
>
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
>
> Mail delivery to my machine (except fo
On Wed, Feb 03, 1999, Lars Hecking wrote:
>
> Is it just me, or has anyone else received all mails from
> mutt-users twice since yesterday? As this only happens with
> mutt-users, I don't think it's a lcoal problem.
The problem was/is at rpi.edu where a user made a mistake. If you
take a loo
Referring to Lars Hecking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Feb 03, 1999:
| Is it just me, or has anyone else received all mails from
| mutt-users twice since yesterday? As this only happens with
| mutt-users, I don't think it's a lcoal problem.
I experience the same here. Lots of duplicate messages,
ro
Hi, folks --
After the first few messages about duplication started going back and
forth, I wondered why I was having such an easy time of things. Then I
realized that my message count from procmail *was* going up (I created
a little alias to grep Folder in my log file and count up the total
wit
On Wed Feb 03, 1999 at 07:29:28AM -0600, Jim Graham wrote:
> Is there (or, perhaps, was there) something really strange going on with
> the list? I've noticed quite a few duplicate messages from various
> people, and along with that, got a bounced e-mail from the list telling
> *ME* that it could
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=J5MfuwkIyy7RmF4Q; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=v9Ux+11Zm5mwPlX6; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
On Tue, Feb 02, 1999 at 12:27:07PM -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
> The name you're looking for is "envelope separator", I believe. :)
[]
> The information stored there comes from the "envelope" of the message.
> The From: header is a cosmetic header stored in your message, but the
> "enve
Is there (or, perhaps, was there) something really strange going on with
the list? I've noticed quite a few duplicate messages from various
people, and along with that, got a bounced e-mail from the list telling
*ME* that it could not deliver the following e-mail *TO ME*...naturally,
including th
Is it just me, or has anyone else received all mails from
mutt-users twice since yesterday? As this only happens with
mutt-users, I don't think it's a lcoal problem.
Hello to all,
there seems to be problem between the listserver and
diwanh.stu.rpi.edu
or is it
rpi.edu
or is it
mail1.its.rpi.edu ?
I just got a "too many hops"-message from my sendmail
and if I have a look at the header of the errorneous message I get the
impression tha
How do I change the current working directory from within a running mutt?
(or the default save location in the attachment menu)
Albert
--
Albert Schueller Department of Mathematics
Office Phone: 509-522-4432 Whitman College
Public Key: http
synthpunk on Tue, Feb 02, 1999 at 01:11:07PM -0500:
> I use mutt to change my From: header to appear to be from
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] when I am sending mail from my main machine.
> I subscribed to a mailing list @ eGroups.com, and it takes the From
> line rather than the From: line as which address
synthpunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I subscribed to a mailing list @ eGroups.com, and it takes the From
> line rather than the From: line as which address to send mail to. the
> list is setup to not allow unsubscribed mails, and it rejects me.
David DeSimone gave a good response to this. I w
Hi, folks --
...and then Mary Ellen Foster said...
% Thus spake Ian Peters...
% > On Tue, Feb 02, 1999 at 08:17:51PM -0500, Ian Peters wrote:
% > > The list-reply function, normally bound to L?
% >
% > I should probably mention the lists command, as well.
% [...]
% > When I am reading mail from
On 1999-02-03 05:22:28 -0500, Scott McDermott wrote:
> When did he stop maintaining the code?
Summer last year. Since then, the mutt-dev crowd is doing
maintenance. I'm the one who has write access to the cvs. ;)
tlr
--
Thomas Roessler · 74a353cc0b19 · dg1ktr · http://home.pages.de/~roessler
Kirk --
...and then Kirk S said...
%
% Thanks, i had not added this list with the lists command in the muttrc. Guess
% i should read the manual.txt more closely, it would help if it was less like a
*grin*
% reference manual and more like a user guide but anyways i'm getting into the
% swing
Thomas Roessler on Wed, Feb 03, 1999 at 10:46:28AM +0100:
> > Haven't seen Michael Elkins in this list in some time, is he still
> > doing mutt, or has he moved on?
>
> I think the last surfacing of Michael I observed was on the
> ietf-open-pgp mailing list. Apparently, he's quite busy with his
On 1999-02-02 22:03:45 -0500, fred smith wrote:
> Haven't seen Michael Elkins in this list in some time, is he still
> doing mutt, or has he moved on?
I think the last surfacing of Michael I observed was on the
ietf-open-pgp mailing list. Apparently, he's quite busy with his
day job.
tlr
--
T
Just nosey... :^)
Haven't seen Michael Elkins in this list in some time, is he still
doing mutt, or has he moved on?
Fred
--
---
.Fred Smith/
( /__ ,__
34 matches
Mail list logo
