On 990310, at 18:38:14, Byrial Jensen wrote:
> All 3 things should be fixed in the attached patch.
After applying this patch, the "Subject:" prompt always begins with "@":
Subject: @
--
David Ellement
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=qGV0fN9tzfkG3CxV; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
On Thursday, 11 March 1999, at 21:41:49 (+),
Johnny Teveßen wrote:
> Now I switched to Eterm/X11, which is capable
> of putting a background image behind the
> console. It works great with mutt (and looks
> phantastic), but in these lines I mentioned
> above the background is turned into *rea
Hi!
When I let mutt display a message, then all
lines between the last line of the mail and
the statusbar are filled with an arithmetic
not sign ('~') in the first column, and the
rest of the lines are filled black. Good, so
I can see what was the very last line of the
mail.
Now I switched to Et
On Thu, Mar 11, 1999 at 02:57:02PM -0800, Farthing W. Fox wrote:
> Hi, folks,
[...]
> For anyone that's going to suggest lynx with
> -force_html and -dump, I've already tried this. Lynx doesn't standard
> input, and it just garbles up all the headers when you give it a file.
Hi, folks,
The company I work at has decided to adopt Netscape Mail as it's corporate
mail reader, and also to move mail to be accessible only from an IMAP
server.
Now, the IMAP server itself is not a problem thanks to Mutt having IMAP
support (yay), but my problem lies with the possibility (a
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=bKyqfOwhbdpXa4YI; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
On 990311, at 01:37:29, Scott McDermott wrote:
> David Ellement on Sun 7/03 10:21 -0800:
> > > --- configure.in Thu Mar 4 18:21:48 1999
> > > +++ configure.in.new Fri Mar 5 06:38:19 1999
> > > @@ -30,7 +30,8 @@
> > > ;;
> > > esac
> > >
> > > -AC_PATH_PROG(SENDMAIL, sendmail, no, $PA
On Thu, Mar 11, 1999 at 09:47:48AM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> I recall that someone posted a pointer to an emacs mutt mode some time
> ago. I'd like to put this one into the contrib area on ftp.guug.de; could
> the author please contact me?
A group of us have been merging a couple of mutt-
According to Thomas Roessler:
> I recall that someone posted a pointer to an emacs mutt mode some
> time ago. I'd like to put this one into the contrib area on
> ftp.guug.de; could the author please contact me?
I'm not the author but here it is:
http://www.randomhacks.com/~emk/mutt.html>
--
O
I recall that someone posted a pointer to an emacs mutt mode some
time ago. I'd like to put this one into the contrib area on
ftp.guug.de; could the author please contact me?
Thanks, tlr
--
http://home.pages.de/~roessler/
David Ellement on Sun 7/03 10:21 -0800:
> > --- configure.inThu Mar 4 18:21:48 1999
> > +++ configure.in.newFri Mar 5 06:38:19 1999
> > @@ -30,7 +30,8 @@
> > ;;
> > esac
> >
> > -AC_PATH_PROG(SENDMAIL, sendmail, no, $PATH:/usr/sbin:/usr/lib)
> > +ac_aux_path_sendmail=":/usr/s
Stewart Wright on Mon 8/03 15:05 +0918:
> You can use the %-sequences from the index-format command in the
> foldernames in fcc, save, and fcc-save hooks.
>
> By using a '%u' the save-to name will be that of the author. This is
> fine when saving doing a save, but falls over when doing a fcc.
Why is it lower case? So one can distinguish, "this is a thread?"
Or does it mean that all messages in the collapsed thread are new?
--
Scott
14 matches
Mail list logo
