Kevin Arnold ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
All,
I have a program that currently uses sendmail. I want to be able to send
attachments so I was thinking about switching to MUTT. The program,
however, sends the mail using a perl scriptso it is done through a CLI.
Can I do the same
On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 07:49:44PM +0200, Jimmy Mäkelä wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 1999 at 11:31:19AM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
I think this would be an excellent improvement! The current 'folders'
display is just a directory listing in a unix'ish format by default
(is it customisable?), this
On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 06:11:28PM -0400, Brendan Cully wrote:
This came up a little bit ago here or on mutt-dev. I'm working on doing
a nicer version of IMAP browsing. What's happening is you're using a
server that allows folders to contain both messages and subfolders
(Cyrus?) - so the
On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 05:38:30PM -0500, David DeSimone wrote:
Chris Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's what I expected to be able to do but if you download the
unstable snapshot there isn't a ./configure with it so you're stuffed!
I don't download the snapshot. At least, I don't
Where can I get a mutt 0.96.xx with a ./configure with it?
ftp://ftp.mutt.org/pub/mutt/devel/mutt-0.96.6i.tar.gz ?
Yes, that's where I have got to in the end! Phew! The snapshots
don't have ./configure with them but the devel tarballs do, how
confusing (well, to me anyway!).
Is it possible to move IMAP4 folders using mutt? This is a
fundamental need with any MUA using IMAP4 as the MUA may be the only
way one has of interacting with the server.
--
Chris Green ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW:
On Wed, Sep 22, 1999 at 12:00:10PM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 07:49:44PM +0200, Jimmy Mäkelä wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 1999 at 11:31:19AM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
I think this would be an excellent improvement! The current 'folders'
display is just a directory
Hi
I think i didnt explain myself pretty well in my last mail.
What i really meant, is there any way to specify my ISP's mail server
in mutt as an outgoing SMTP server, as i can do in other mail clients
like Netscape for example?
Thanks :)
Carl Johan Madestrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 22 Sep 1999:
What i really meant, is there any way to specify my ISP's mail server
in mutt as an outgoing SMTP server, as i can do in other mail clients
like Netscape for example?
The short answer is "no".
The longer answer is still no,
On Wed, Sep 22, 1999 at 02:03:30PM +0200, Carl Johan Madestrand thus spoke:
Hi
I think i didnt explain myself pretty well in my last mail.
What i really meant, is there any way to specify my ISP's mail server
in mutt as an outgoing SMTP server, as i can do in other mail clients
like
Thomas Schoepf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 22 Sep 1999:
How can I do this with mutt? 'reply' only takes the sender and
'group-reply' ignores the sender.
It doesn't for me.
Maybe your $alternatives setting is incorrect? That might make mutt to
not send to the sender of the email, if it
Good day!
I just wanted to ask if $subject annoys someone else. I'm a recent user
of 1.0pre2 and it has a bug fixed with a side-effect: I can't use 'y' and
'n' answering yes-or-no questions - only russian chars work. Previous
version let me use both cyrillic and latin chars.
I explored both
Carl Johan Madestrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What i really meant, is there any way to specify my ISP's mail server
in mutt as an outgoing SMTP server, as i can do in other mail clients
like Netscape for example?
Netscape tries to do everything itself, because they probably got tired
of
Mikko Hänninen [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Thomas Schoepf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 22 Sep 1999:
How can I do this with mutt? 'reply' only takes the sender and
Maybe your $alternatives setting is incorrect? That might make mutt to
not send to the sender of the email, if it thought it
Mikko Hänninen [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Jeremy Blosser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 22 Sep 1999:
Also check and see if the mail has a Mail-Followup-To set, as if it does
Mutt will use this for a group-reply.
Not for list-reply? I thought Mail-Followup-To was for list emails.
No,
Mikko Hänninen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not for list-reply? I thought Mail-Followup-To was for list emails.
Mail-Followup-To *is* for list emails, but perhaps not in the way you
think.
There is often an annoyance factor to being on a mailing list. If you
make a post to the list, some people
David DeSimone [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Well, Mail-Followup-To is an attempt to fix that. When you send mail to
a list to which you are subscribed, Mutt knows this because you have
told it so, using the "lists" directive. So, it will insert a
Mail-Followup-To header, so that other list
Carl Johan Madestrand [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
I think i didnt explain myself pretty well in my last mail.
What i really meant, is there any way to specify my ISP's mail server
in mutt as an outgoing SMTP server, as i can do in other mail clients
like Netscape for example?
I think you're
Jeremy Blosser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a nit, but Mutt only inserts the header if $followup_to is set.
Yes, and mine is set.
And your mail had no Mail-Followup-To header, so if you find it so
useful you may want to set it so other people can make use of it for
replies to your mails
David DeSimone [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Jeremy Blosser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And your mail had no Mail-Followup-To header, so if you find it so
useful you may want to set it so other people can make use of it for
replies to your mails ;)
Err... I *do* have followup_to set, and
Hi!
Tired of switching configuration to generate signed or encrypted
messages processable by PGP 2.x using folks (a lot here in Germany)
I wrote a wrapper for use with mutt which selects the proper options automatically
based on the chosen keys, which must be all of RSA
type. (The main reason
On Wednesday, 22 September 1999 at 21:12, Allan K. Neal wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 04:07:52AM +0200, Gero Treuner wrote:
management interface). Still I don't know a way to make GnuPG both
sign and encrypt a message at the same time, but I can live with that.
Gero
To get GnuPG to
Does it make messages that PGP 2.6 can read? I think that is the issue.
As I think I may have posted before, there is a patch somewhere on the
gpg-dev list archive to make this possible, but it isn't trivial due to
the fact that PGP 2.6 relies on tempfiles whereas GPG uses pipes, so GPG
23 matches
Mail list logo
