Stephan --
...and then Stephan Seitz said...
% Hi!
%
% On Sam, Mär 04, 2000 at 02:19:36 +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote
% > Mutt-1.1.8 is out. This is another BETA version. Changes
%
% I would like to know, which patches for 1.0 are part of the new
% version.
% I am using the save_alias-patch an
Mikko --
...and then Mikko Hänninen said...
% Hi,
%
% Awhile ago I asked about Mutt support for message/partial. The answer
% was that "not yet, maybe someone will write it some day".
*grin*
%
% So, does anyone know any program which can automatically assemble these
% parts? I just got an
I am trying to understand how the status indicator in the folder list
(if I'm using the term correctly), gets updated
to show new mail in a folder.
I've got a half dozen folders created
by procmail. My mail_check is set to 5. It often happens that I find
new mail within a folder (and new sinc
Hi,
Awhile ago I asked about Mutt support for message/partial. The answer
was that "not yet, maybe someone will write it some day".
So, does anyone know any program which can automatically assemble these
parts? I just got an email which has been split into 73 parts, so the
"vi filter" doesn't
On Sat, Mar 11, 2000 at 11:38:10AM -0500, John P. Verel wrote:
> I have a long list of Eudora aliases, which look, by and large, to be
> in the correct format for import into Mutt. Does anyone have any
> tips, suggestions, on the conversion process?
>
> Thanks.
>
Hi John,
by and large, the f
On Sun, Mar 12, 2000 at 03:35:40PM -0500, John P. Verel wrote:
> On 03/06/00, 09:24:12PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm searching a solution to properly print messages with paragraphs in long single
>lines (in fact, like this one...).
>
> I use enscript with excellent re
On 03/06/00, 09:24:12PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm searching a solution to properly print messages with paragraphs in long single
>lines (in fact, like this one...).
I use enscript with excellent results. Here's the entry from my
.muttrc file:
set print_command="enscript
Eugene Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sun, 12 Mar 2000:
> So do the ignore/unignore commands deal with shell globbing only?
No, they use special kind of wildcards, it's not even shell globbing.
For them the rules are:
- "*" is a special entry which means "all headers"
- "something-" means that
I ran into a problem with the ignore/unignore commands. It appears that
the patterns they accept cannot be regex patterns. This works:
ignore *
and this works:
unignore subject: to: from:
but this doesn't work:
unignore ^(Subject|To|From):
So do the ignore/unignore
